Search Results for "Withdrawal from acquisition"

172 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 172 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Land Acquisition for Public Purpose — Compensation Award Not Challenged on Merits. Petitioners' Challenge to Acquisition Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894 Fails as They Did Not Seek Reference for Higher Compensation and Acquiesced to Proceedings.

The petitioners, legal heirs of the original owner Anwar Hajee Alimohammed Hajee Cassum Agboatwala and other co-owners, filed a writ petition under Ar...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses Petition by Corporation of the City of Panaji Challenging Compensation Award Under Section 48 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894. Court Holds That Petitioner Failed to Show Any Error in the Award and Scope of Judicial Review Is Limited.

The petitioner, Corporation of the City of Panaji, challenged an award dated 08.07.2014 passed by the Land Acquisition Officer (LAO) under Section 48 ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal in Land Acquisition Dispute for Lack of Jurisdiction. Civil Court lacks jurisdiction to entertain suit challenging acquisition under Land Acquisition Act, 1894, as remedy lies before Reference Court under Section 18.

The appellants, owners of a property in Agonda, Goa, filed a suit seeking withdrawal from acquisition of their plots and compensation of Rs. 1,20,00,0...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses MSRDC's Petition Challenging Withdrawal from Land Acquisition Under Section 48(1) of Land Acquisition Act, 1894. Subsequent Purchaser Allowed to Seek Return of Land as Acquisition Was Not Completed Within Stipulated Time.

The petitioner, Maharashtra State Road Development Corporation Ltd. (MSRDC), challenged the judgment and order dated 6th December 2005 passed by the L...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Slum Land Acquisition Despite Interim Stay on Declaration — Acquisition Under Section 14 of Maharashtra Slum Areas Act Valid as Stay Did Not Cover Acquisition Proceedings

The petitioners, Murlidhar Teckchand Gandhi and others, owned property bearing CTS No. 165, 165/1 to 51 at Village Kanjur, Mumbai. The property was de...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Acquisition of Land by the State – Authority of the Beneficiary Board – Public Policy Violation – Arbitrability of Land Acquisition Disputes – Effect of Illegal Agreements – Fraud on Sovereign Power

Acquisition of land under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, once completed with possession taken, results in absolute vesting in the Government, beyond ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Slum Land Acquisition Despite Interim Stay on Declaration. Acquisition Under Section 14 of Maharashtra Slum Areas Act Held Independent of Declaration Under Section 4, Not Barred by Interim Order.

The petitioners, Murlidhar Teckchand Gandhi and others, challenged the acquisition of their property bearing CTS No. 165, 165/1 to 51 at Village Kanju...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Nagpur Dismisses Claimant's Appeal for Enhanced Compensation and Partly Allows State's Appeal in Land Acquisition Case — Market Value Determined at Rs. 100 per sq.ft Based on Comparable Sale Instances.

The case involves two appeals arising from a land acquisition matter. The land, measuring 1.21 HR (1,29,345 sq.ft) out of Survey No. 118/3 at Digras, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Cooperative Society's Appeals Challenging Sale Deeds Executed in Favor of Members. Arbitrator under Delhi Cooperative Societies Act lacks jurisdiction to adjudicate validity of registered sale deeds, which can only be challenged before civil court.

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeals filed by Delhi Dayalbagh Cooperative House Building Society Ltd. against the orders of the Delhi High Court, w...