Search Results for "Vexatious Litigation"

367 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 367 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Challenge to Administrative Enquiry Closure in Corruption Allegations Against Court Staff. Vexatious Litigation and Failure to Produce Evidence Lead to Dismissal with Rs. 50,000 Costs Under Article 226 of Constitution.

The writ petition arose from a complaint of corruption made by the petitioner, a complainant in a criminal case under the Negotiable Instruments Act, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Quo Warranto Petition Challenging Appointment of Additional Judge as Abuse of Process. Petition filed by an advocate questioning appointment of Respondent No.7 as additional judge of Bombay High Court held to be trumpery and frivolous.

The petitioner, an advocate practicing in the Bombay High Court, filed a writ petition seeking a writ of quo warranto challenging the appointment of R...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Refers Matter to Chief Justice on Advocates' Misconduct in Vexatious SLP Filing. Advocates Filed Second SLP with Incorrect Statements After Dismissal of First, Tendered Unconditional Apology, Leading to Divergent Judicial Opinions Under Supreme Court Rules, 2013.

The Supreme Court was confronted with a case involving misconduct by advocates in filing a vexatious special leave petition. The petitioner, convicted...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging SRA Scheme for Lack of Public Interest. Court finds that the petition is not a genuine public interest litigation but is filed to further personal interests of the petitioner.

The petitioner, claiming to be the President of Mumbai Division of Maharashtra Machhimar Kruti Samiti, filed a Public Interest Litigation challenging ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Rejection of Plaint Rejection Application in Suit for Specific Performance. Court holds that plaint cannot be rejected under Order VII Rule 11 CPC when it discloses a cause of action and raises triable issues regarding fraud and misrepresentation.

The petitioners, defendants in a suit for specific performance, filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging an or...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second PIL on Same Subject Matter as Abuse of Process. Successive PILs through different organizations but same advocate on identical issues held not maintainable and dismissed with costs.

The present Public Interest Litigation (PIL) was filed by National Amnesty & Redemption Organisation International Trust through its President, Deepak...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Examines Civil Revision Applications Against Trial Court's Refusal to Reject Plaint. Applications Under Order VII Rule 11 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 Challenged on Grounds of Limitation and Lack of Cause of Action in Land Ownership Suit.

The litigation arose from a land dispute concerning Survey No.3 (Gut No.28) at village Rahimpur, Tq. and Dist. Nanded. The original plaintiff Babanrao...