Search Results for "Unauthorized trades"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "Unauthorized trades"

39 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 39 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Commodity Brokerage Dispute — Upholds Tribunal's Finding That Broker Failed to Prove Client's Liability. Member Client Agreement and Running Account Basis Did Not Shift Burden of Proof to Client Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

16 Apr 2015

The petitioner, Bonanza Commodities Brokers Pvt. Ltd., a member of Multi Commodity Exchange of India Ltd. (MCX), filed a petition under Section 34 of ...

High Court

High Court Dismisses Challenge to NSE Appellate Arbitral Award in Stock Broker Dispute — Upholds Squaring Off of Client's Position Due to Margin Shortfall. Regulation 3.10 of NSE F&O Regulations Does Not Mandate Prior Written Notice Before Squaring Off; Award Based on Evidence.

6 Dec 2018

The Petitioner, M/s Shaunik Infotech Pvt Ltd, was a registered client of the Respondent, India Infoline Ltd, a trading member of the National Stock Ex...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Favor of Client Against Trading Member for Unauthorized Trades. Award of Rs.6,59,634.54 with interest upheld as not patently illegal under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

19 Nov 2012

The petitioner, Angel Broking Private Limited, a trading member, challenged an arbitral award dated 29 August 2009 passed by a sole arbitrator appoint...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Examines Challenge to Arbitral Award Directing Payment of Rs.9,28,188.45 with Interest. The petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 arises from a member-client dispute over stock market transactions and margin shortfalls.

14 Oct 2014

The petitioner filed an Arbitration Petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 before the High Court of Judicature at Bom...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitration Award in Stock Broker Dispute — Upholds Award for Losses Due to Unauthorized Squaring Off of Positions. The court held that the arbitral award was based on evidence and reasoning, and no ground for interference under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 was made out.

5 Mar 2012

The case involves a challenge by HSBC InvestDirect Securities (India) Ltd. (formerly IL & FS Investsmart Securities Ltd.), a stock broker registered w...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Arbitral Award in Stock Broker Dispute — No Patent Illegality Found. Claimant's claim for refund of margin money and compensation for unauthorized trades upheld as arbitrator's findings of fact are final under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

17 Dec 2014

The judgment concerns two arbitration petitions under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging a common arbitral award da...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Stock Exchange Dispute — No Grounds for Interference Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The court held that the arbitral award was not in conflict with public policy and did not suffer from patent illegality, as the tribunal's findings were based on evidence and were plausible.

30 Nov -0001

The petitioner, MPDA Associates Pvt. Ltd., a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeals Against Arbitral Award in Commodity Brokerage Dispute — Upholds Award of Damages for Unauthorized Trades and Deficiency in Service. The Court held that the arbitrator's findings on breach of contract and negligence were not perverse and did not warrant interference under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

30 Dec 2020

The case involves appeals filed by IFIN Commodities Limited (the appellant-broker) against an arbitral award that had been upheld by a Single Judge un...

High Court

Bombay High Court Commercial Division Considers Section 34 Petition Against Arbitral Award Imposing Liability on Depository for Broker's Actions. The petition challenges the award's finding that CDSL must indemnify investor for breach by its depository participant despite the broker's misuse of power of attorney.

1 Dec 2025

Background: The petition pertains to a challenge under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 against an arbitral award that held th...

High Court

Bombay High Court Examines Section 34 Challenge to NSE Arbitral Awards on Limitation Grounds. Court Holds Three-Month Time Limit Under NSE Bye-laws Rule 13(b) is Directory and First Hearing Date Under Rule 13(d) is Date of Actual Hearing, Not Scheduled Hearing.

14 Aug 2025

The matter arose from an arbitration petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 filed by an investor challenging an appel...

1 2 3 4

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)