Search Results for "ULP complaint"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Compulsory Retirement Case Based on Declining ...
Supreme Court Upholds High Court's Determination that Non-Signatory to MoS Not B...

Search Results for "ULP complaint"

601 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 601 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Examines Whether GlaxoSmithKline Decision on Territorial Jurisdiction Stands Overruled by Supreme Court. Issue Pertains to Determination of Territorial Jurisdiction of Labour/Industrial Courts Under MRTU Act When Employees Are Posted Outside Maharashtra But Employer's Office Is Within State.

3 Nov 2025

The High Court of Bombay heard a batch of matters comprising Appeal No. 585 of 2009 and several connected writ petitions. The core dispute centered on...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Industrial Court Jurisdiction in Transfer Dispute Under MRTU & PULP Act — Issuance of Transfer Order at Mumbai Confers Jurisdiction. Transfer order issued at Mumbai to employee posted in Rajasthan held to confer jurisdiction on Industrial Court at Mumbai under Section 28 of MRTU & PULP Act, 1971.

19 Sep 2025

The petition was filed by Raptakos Brett & Co. Ltd., a pharmaceutical company, challenging an order of the Industrial Court at Mumbai dated 4 May 2022...

High Court

Bombay High Court Sets Aside Industrial Court Stay on Promotion/Transfer Order in Newspaper Company Dispute — Transfer as Condition of Service Upheld in Absence of Malafides. Court holds that Industrial Court cannot interfere with transfer order issued in exigencies of service when transfer is an express condition of employment and no prima facie case of malafide is made out.

2 Jul 2024

The Bombay High Court dealt with a petition challenging an interim order of the Industrial Court, Thane, which temporarily restrained the petitioners ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition of Daily Wager Challenging Industrial Court's Order on Res Judicata Grounds. Petitioner's claim for permanency and equal pay barred by earlier complaint dismissed for default, but High Court upholds dismissal on ground of abuse of process.

12 Jan 2024

The petitioner, Rajendra Tribhuvandas Navare, a retired daily wager employed with Solapur Municipal Corporation, filed a writ petition challenging the...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Petition Challenging Industrial Court's Order Granting Full Back-Wages to Employee. Labour Court's Finding of Shockingly Disproportionate Penalty Upheld Under MRTU & PULP Act.

29 Nov 2022

The Maharashtra State Co-operative Marketing Federation Ltd (petitioner) challenged the judgment and order dated 19.04.2018 passed by the Industrial C...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Upholds Labour Court Award in Favor of Workman in MSRTC Dismissal Case — 25% Back Wages Granted for Procedural Violation. Dismissal Quashed as Enquiry Officer Was Not Appointed by Competent Authority Under Section 6(6) of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

9 Aug 2019

The petitioner, the Divisional Controller of Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation (MSRTC), challenged the judgment and award dated 4.8.2018 of...

High Court

Bombay High Court Partially Allows Employee's Petition and Dismisses Employer's Cross-Petition in Unfair Labour Practice Case — Employee Denied SSRP Scheme but Granted Reinstatement Without Back Wages or Lumpsum Compensation. Reinstatement with continuity of service upheld but lumpsum compensation option set aside as not a valid alternative under Section 30 of MRTU and PULP Act, 1971.

8 Aug 2013

The judgment involves two cross writ petitions arising from an order of the 7th Labour Court, Mumbai in Complaint (ULP) No.236 of 1994. The employee, ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in MRTU & PULP Act Case — Res Judicata Applies to Issue of Workman Status. The Court held that the finding in a prior complaint that the respondent was not a workman operates as res judicata in a subsequent complaint between the same parties.

16 Mar 2011

The case involves an appeal by the Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Ltd. against a judgment of a learned Single Judge of the Bombay ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Petitions Challenging Labour Court Orders in Unfair Labour Practice Complaints. Summary jurisdiction under Section 28 of MRTU & PULP Act does not bar determination of disputed employer-employee relationship when status is prima facie established.

26 Aug 2010

The judgment involves three writ petitions filed by Birla Cotsyn (India) Ltd., the employer, challenging identical orders passed by the Labour Court a...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Labour Court's Order Converting Dismissal into Retrenchment for Workman Found Guilty of Misconduct. Punishment of Dismissal Held Disproportionate to Misconduct of Theft of Company Property; Workman Entitled to Retrenchment Compensation and Notice Pay.

18 Aug 2010

The petitioner, Kirloskar Copeland Ltd., challenged the order of the Labour Court, Satara, dated 24th April 1996, in Complaint (ULP) No.17 of 1988, an...

1 2 3 4

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)