Search Results for "UAPA"

121 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 121 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes FIR Against Accused in UAPA and BNS Case for Lack of Sanction Under Section 13 of UAPA — Failure to Obtain Prior Approval from Central Government Renders Investigation Invalid

The case involves two criminal petitions filed under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (BNSS) seeking quashing of FIR in Cri...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Sets Aside Bail Granted by Calcutta High Court in Jnaneshwari Express Derailment Case — CBI Investigation Undermined by Premature Release. Reverse Burden of Proof Under Section 436A CrPC Not Applicable Where Investigation Ongoing and Trial Not Commenced.

The Supreme Court heard appeals by the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) against the grant of bail to multiple accused persons in connection with ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Grants Bail to PFI Accused in UAPA Case Due to Lack of Prima Facie Evidence and Parity with Co-Accused. Appellant's Custody Since July 2022 Without Charge Framing Violates Article 21.

The appellant, Athar Parwez, was arrested on 12.07.2022 in connection with FIR No. 827/2022 registered at Police Station Phulwari Sharif, Patna, under...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Bail Appeal in 2012 Pune Bomb Blasts Case Due to Inordinate Delay in Trial. Right to Speedy Trial Under Article 21 of the Constitution Overrides Statutory Restrictions Under Section 43-D(5) of UAPA.

The appellant, Munib Iqbal Memon, was arrested on 26 December 2012 in connection with five bomb blasts that occurred in Pune on 1 August 2012. The bla...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Conviction Under UAPA and IPC for Terrorist Conspiracy and Murder. Conspiracy to Kill Rationalist Activist Proved Through Circumstantial Evidence and Confession of Co-Accused.

The appellant, Mirza Himayat Beig @ Umar, was convicted by the trial court for offences under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967 (UAPA) an...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Grants Bail to Accused in UAPA Case Due to Prolonged Incarceration and Weak Evidence. Bail was allowed as appellants were in custody for over four years without charges framed, and evidence under Sections 120B and 302 IPC and UAPA provisions was insufficient to deny bail.

The Supreme Court considered an appeal by two accused persons, identified as accused nos. 46 and 47, who were charged with offences under the Unlawful...