Search Results for "Transmission tower"

66 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 66 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Allows Petition Challenging Notification and Order for Removal of Obstructions — Violation of Natural Justice. Order Under Section 16(1) of Indian Telegraph Act, 1885 Quashed as Petitioners Were Not Heard.

The petitioners, Dalwadi Pramodkumar Dayarambhai and others, filed a writ petition before the Gujarat High Court challenging a notification published ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Dismisses Intra-Court Appeal in High Tension Tower Erection Dispute on Patta Land. Court Directs Landowner to Seek Compensation Under Section 16(3) of Indian Telegraph Act, 1885, Upholding Public Interest in Essential Services over Private Land Objections.

The dispute arose from the proposed erection of a high tension tower on patta land belonging to the appellant, Jaya Santhi, in Sethupattu Village, Tir...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Transmission Tower Construction Under Subsequently Revoked Restraint Order. Work done under Section 16(2) Indian Telegraph Act, 1885 order held valid despite later revocation for lack of jurisdiction, as order was in force at time of execution.

The petitioner, Maheshkumar G. Garodia, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court challenging ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition for Rental Compensation for Transmission Towers Erected in 1981 Without Consent or Compensation. Landowners entitled to compensation under Section 10(d) of the Indian Telegraph Act, 1885 read with Section 164 of the Electricity Act, 2003 for continued use of land.

The petitioners, eight landowners from Ashiv and Wangi villages in Latur district, filed a writ petition seeking quashing of an order dated 04.07.2018...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Telecom Infrastructure Charges Case Over Retrospective Application. Appellant's Circular Increasing Charges from 2009 Held Invalid as Yearly Payments Are Made Upfront, Making Retrospective Burden Unreasonable Under Interconnection Agreements.

The dispute arose from appeals filed by Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd. challenging a judgment by the Telecom Disputes Settlement and Appellate Tribunal. Th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Vodafone's Appeal on CENVAT Credit for Telecom Towers and Shelters. CENVAT Credit on Towers and Prefabricated Buildings Denied as They Are Immovable Property and Not Capital Goods Under CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004.

The Appellant, Vodafone India Ltd., filed appeals under section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944 read with section 83 of the Finance Act, 1994, cha...