Search Results for "Transmission Licensee"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Compulsory Retirement Case Based on Declining ...
Supreme Court Upholds High Court's Determination that Non-Signatory to MoS Not B...

Search Results for "Transmission Licensee"

116 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 116 result(s)

High Court

Writ Petition Filed Under Articles 226 and 227 Seeking Quashing of Impugned Order Dated 05.02.2024 and Mandamus for Relocation of Transmission Tower. Challenge Based on Lack of Consent Under Section 67(2) of Electricity Act, 2003 and Violation of Natural Justice.

23 Apr 2024

The petitioners, five brothers who jointly own agricultural land measuring 6 acres 02 guntas in Kasinakunte village, Nidagundi Taluk, Vijayapura Distr...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes SDO's Compensation Order in Transmission Line Dispute; Rules that Telegraph Authority Alone Has Jurisdiction Under Telegraph Act. Transmission Licensee Constituted as Telegraph Authority Under Section 164 of Electricity Act, 2003 Holds Exclusive Power to Determine Compensation Under Section 10(d) of Indian Telegraph Act, 1885, and General Circulars Cannot Override.

7 Dec 2023

The writ petition was filed by Maharashtra Eastern Grid Power Transmission Company Ltd., a transmission licensee, challenging an order dated 05/09/201...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Penalty for Excess Load Consumption as Unauthorised Use of Electricity Under Section 126 of Electricity Act, 2003 — Assessment at Twice the Higher Tariff Applicable for the Category of Use, Not Consumer's Category. The court held that consumption in excess of connected load constitutes unauthorised use under Explanation (b)(iv) and assessment under Section 126(6) must be at twice the tariff for the category for which electricity was unauthorisedly used.

9 Dec 2022

The case involves a batch of appeals by the Kerala State Electricity Board (KSEB) against a judgment of the Kerala High Court which held that for unau...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal by Distribution Licensee, Holds Captive Users Not Liable for Additional Surcharge Under Section 42(4) of Electricity Act, 2003. Captive generation and open access for self-consumption are statutory rights under Section 9, not requiring State Commission permission, thus additional surcharge is not leviable.

10 Dec 2021

The case involves an appeal by Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Co. Ltd. (the distribution licensee) against the order of the Appellate Trib...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Distribution Licensee's Right to Levy Wheeling Charges on 110 kV Feeders — 110 kV HPCL Feeders Held Integral Part of Distribution Network Despite Voltage Level. The Court held that the functional use of the feeders for distribution to a single consumer, HPCL, determines their classification as distribution assets, not merely the voltage level under CEA Regulations, 2010.

3 Apr 2020

The case involves a dispute between Sai Wardha Power Generation Limited (SWPGL) and Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited (HPCL) on one side, and Ta...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Adjudicates Challenge to Karnataka Electricity Regulatory Commission Order on Wheeling and Banking Charges for Renewable Energy Generators. The court examined the validity of the order dated 14.05.2018 under the Electricity Act, 2003.

13 Mar 2019

A batch of writ petitions under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India was filed before the High Court of Karnataka by several renewable en...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Injunction in Electricity Act Dispute — LILO Scheme Not a 'Works' Under Section 164. Court holds that LILO scheme does not constitute 'laying of electric lines' under Section 164 of the Electricity Act, 2003, and that the District Judge correctly upheld the injunction against the petitioner.

9 Jan 2019

The petitioner, Century Rayon Limited, challenged an order dated 28 June 2018 passed by the learned District Judge-4, Kalyan, dismissing its Miscellan...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses MCGM's Challenge to MERC Regulation on Compensation for Delayed Electricity Connections. Regulation 4.10 requiring distribution licensees to pay compensation for failure to provide new connections within stipulated period is valid and not ultra vires the Electricity Act, 2003.

2 Mar 2016

The Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai (MCGM), through its Brihanmumbai Electric Supply & Transport Undertaking (BES&T), filed a writ petition un...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses MCGM's Challenge to MERC Regulation on Compensation for Delayed Electricity Connections. Regulation 4.10 requiring compensation for failure to provide new connections within stipulated time is held valid under Section 181 read with Section 57 of the Electricity Act, 2003.

2 Mar 2016

The Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai (MCGM), a statutory corporation and local authority, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Consti...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Licensee’s Appeal Against Direct Electricity Supply by Board. Board’s Action Upheld as Comparison of Maximum Demand Under Section 19(1)(b)(ii) of Electricity (Supply) Act, 1948 Required Assessment of Actual Supply, Not Generating Capacity.

29 Jan 1969

The appellant, Sihor Electricity Works Ltd., held a licence under the Indian Electricity Act, 1910 for generation and distribution of electrical energ...

1 2 3 4

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)