Search Results for "Suspension Revocation"

98 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 98 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows Management's Appeal in Industrial Dispute Case — Labour Court's Finding of Oral Termination Set Aside as Contrary to Documentary Evidence. Suspension Revocation Order Existed and Workman Failed to Report for Duty, No Termination Occurred.

The appellant, Management of Roots Polycraft, filed an intra-court appeal under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the order dated 12.09.2024 in ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Suspension Order of Municipal Sub-Engineer. Court holds that suspension order need not disclose reasons and subsistence allowance is payable upon declaration of no gainful employment.

The petitioner, Mr. Nivedan Bhimrao Torne, a Sub-Engineer employed with the Brihanmumbai Mahanagarpalika (Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai), wa...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Release of Imported Bearings in IPR Suspension Case — Mandamus Issued for Violation of IPR Rules 2007. Customs Authorities Suspended Clearance Without Confiscation Order or Notice Under Rule 7 of IPR Rules, Violating Principles of Natural Justice.

The petitioners, NBU Bearings Pvt. Ltd. and another, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition of Professor Against Suspension Due to Non-Service of Chargesheet. Suspension Order Dated 29th May 2015 Quashed as State Failed to Show Diligence in Serving Chargesheet Within Four Months.

The petitioner, Dr. Narender Omprakash Bansal, a Professor of Cardiology and Head of Department at Grant Medical College and Sir J.J. Group of Hospita...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Prohibitory Order Under Regulation 21 of CHALR, 2004 — No Appeal Lies to CESTAT. Regulation 22(8) of CHALR, 2004 is Not Ultra Vires the Customs Act, 1962.

The appeal arises from a decision of the CESTAT dated 2 January 2013, which held that an appeal is not maintainable against an order passed under Regu...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses BEST Undertaking's Petition Challenging Industrial Court Order in Suspension Case. Suspension of Deputy Charge Engineer Held Invalid as Standing Orders Not Applicable, But Unfair Labour Practice Found Due to Non-Compliance with Procedure.

The Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation (BEST Undertaking) challenged an order of the Industrial Court which had allowed the complaint of unfair labour...