Bombay High Court Allows Petition of Professor Against Suspension Due to Non-Service of Chargesheet. Suspension Order Dated 29th May 2015 Quashed as State Failed to Show Diligence in Serving Chargesheet Within Four Months.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY In Favour of Accused
  • 302
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Dr. Narender Omprakash Bansal, a Professor of Cardiology and Head of Department at Grant Medical College and Sir J.J. Group of Hospital, filed a writ petition challenging his suspension order dated 29th May 2015 and the judgment of the Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal dated 16th October 2015 in Original Application No.444 of 2015. The Tribunal had partly allowed the application but did not quash the suspension. The petitioner sought quashing of both the suspension and the Tribunal's order. The High Court noted that although the suspension was not proved to be mala fide, the State's conduct was not diligent as no chargesheet was served even after four months of suspension. The court held that suspension cannot be continued indefinitely without serving a chargesheet and directed the respondents to revoke the suspension order within two weeks. The petition was allowed in terms of the prayer for quashing the suspension order.

Headnote

A) Service Law - Suspension - Inordinate Delay - Maharashtra Civil Services (Discipline and Appeal) Rules - Suspension order challenged on ground of non-service of chargesheet for four months - Court held that suspension without chargesheet for such period is not sustainable and directed revocation - Held that power to suspend exists but must be exercised diligently (Paras 3-5).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the suspension of a government employee can be continued without serving a chargesheet for an extended period

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The petition is allowed. The impugned order of suspension dated 29th May 2015 is quashed and set aside. The respondents are directed to revoke the suspension order within two weeks from today.

Law Points

  • Suspension cannot be indefinite
  • chargesheet must be served within reasonable time
  • review of suspension must be periodic
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2016 LawText (BOM) (03) 172

Writ Petition No.11987 of 2015

2016-03-11

D.H. Waghela, C.J., M.S. Sonak, J.

2016:BHC-AS:6800-DB

Mr. R.A. Dada, Senior Advocate with Mr. R.D. Soni, Mr. Sujay Gawde, Mr. Kamal Bhatt and Mr. Ajay Sharma i/by Shree & Co. for Petitioner; Mr. C.P. Yadav, Assistant Government Pleader for Respondents State

Dr. Narender Omprakash Bansal

The Additional Chief Secretary, Medical Education and Drugs Department, Government of Maharashtra; The Director, Medical Education and Research, St. George's Hospital, Mumbai; The Dean, Grant Medical College and Sir J.J. Group of Hospital, Mumbai; The State of Maharashtra

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition challenging suspension order and Tribunal's judgment

Remedy Sought

Quashing of suspension order dated 29th May 2015 and Tribunal's judgment dated 16th October 2015

Filing Reason

Suspension without serving chargesheet for four months

Previous Decisions

Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal partly allowed Original Application No.444 of 2015 but did not quash suspension

Issues

Whether suspension can continue without serving chargesheet for four months

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that suspension without chargesheet is unsustainable Respondents argued that power to suspend exists and material justified suspension

Ratio Decidendi

Suspension cannot be continued indefinitely without serving a chargesheet; the State must act diligently in disciplinary proceedings.

Judgment Excerpts

The fact that the suspension is certainly the matter of hardship. In the background that in present case though four months have passed to the suspension, chargesheet is not served on the applicant and even review as regards continuation or revocation of suspension is not shown to have been taken. Though suspension is not proved to be mala fide, the conduct of State is not shown or seen to be diligent.

Procedural History

The petitioner was suspended on 29th May 2015. He filed Original Application No.444 of 2015 before the Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal, which partly allowed it on 16th October 2015 but did not quash the suspension. The petitioner then filed the present writ petition.

Acts & Sections

  • Maharashtra Civil Services (Discipline and Appeal) Rules:
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Examines Validity of Open Enquiry Notices Against Group-A Officer for Alleged Procedural Non-Compliance with Government Circular. Petitioner Argued that Mandatory Consent from Administrative Department Was Not Obtained Prior to Issu...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Charity Commissioner's Order in Trust Dispute — Maintainability of Appeal Under Section 72 of Maharashtra Public Trusts Act, 1950 Upheld. Alternate Remedy of Appeal Under Section 72 of Maharasht...