Search Results for "Surplus vacant land"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "Surplus vacant land"

133 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 133 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Refund of Excess One-Time Premium in ULC Act Repeal Case — Premium Chargeable Only on Exempted Surplus Vacant Land. The court held that the one-time premium under the 2019 GR and 2021 GR cannot be levied on retainable land, only on exempted surplus land under Section 20 of the Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976.

7 Aug 2024

The petitioners, owners of land bearing Survey No.429/1/2 and CTS No.1069-A/A-1 and 1069-A/B-1, sought a refund of Rs.2,66,75,750/- paid as one-time p...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes ULC Act Demand for Entire Land Area Including Vacant Land — Demand Must Be Limited to Built-Up Area Only. The court held that under the repealed Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976, a demand for payment cannot include vacant land as per the Section 20 Exemption Order Schedule.

9 Aug 2023

The petitioners challenged a demand of Rs 6,09,66,477 raised by the District Collector and Competent Authority under the Urban Land (Ceiling and Regul...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Premium Demand on Entire Land in ULC Repeal Case — Demand Must Be Limited to Vacant Land Only. The Court held that under the repealed Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976, a premium demand for the entire land including built-up area is impermissible; only vacant land as per the exemption order can be subject to premium.

9 Aug 2023

The Petitioner, Modern Paints, a partnership firm, acquired land in Oshiwara, Mumbai, under a conveyance dated 12 June 1975. On 1 August 1977, it file...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes ULC Act Demand for Excess Land Due to Repeal and Non-Completion of Proceedings. Demand for Rs 6,09,66,477 raised under Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976 set aside as proceedings were not finalized before the Act's repeal and the land was not vested in the State.

9 Aug 2023

The petitioners, nine individuals, filed a writ petition challenging a demand of Rs 6,09,66,477 raised by the District Collector and Competent Authori...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Seeking Declaration That ULC Act Proceedings Lapsed Upon Repeal — Land in Village Drugdhamna Not Vested in State as Possession Not Taken Prior to Repeal Act, 1999. The court held that under Section 3 of the Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Repeal Act, 1999, proceedings under the ULC Act lapse if possession of the land has not been taken before the repeal, and the land does not vest in the State.

7 Jun 2019

The petitioners, Sunilkumar Motilal Sharma, Sushilkumar Motilal Sharma, Subhashkumar Ratanlal Sharma, and the legal representatives of Smt. Sunita Ume...

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Adjudicated Three Writ Petitions Involving Ownership and Compensation for Land at Village Ulwe. The Petitions Raised Issues Under the Inam Abolition Act, Land Acquisition Act, and the Indian Forest Act Regarding Vesting, Compensation, and Restoration of Possession.

14 Oct 2014

The dispute arose from three writ petitions filed before the Bombay High Court concerning land bearing Survey No. 51/0 at village Ulwe, Taluka Panvel,...

High Court

Bombay High Court Reserves Judgment in Multiparty Dispute Over Land Ownership and Compensation Under Inam Abolition Act. Privy Council Declaration of Inam Title and Forest Management Agreement Form Core of Dispute Over 157‑Acre Property Transferred to CIDCO Without Acquisition.

14 Oct 2014

The dispute concerned a large parcel of land bearing Survey No. 51/0 at Ulwe, Raigad, originally granted in 1816. The Bivalkars claimed ownership thro...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Landholder's Petition Challenging Condition Imposed by State to Waive Right to Seek Enhanced Compensation Under Land Acquisition Act. State Cannot Compel Landholder to Furnish Undertaking Not to Seek Reference Under Section 18 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894 as Condition for Release of Compensation for Land Previously Under Urban Land Ceiling Act.

12 Aug 2010

The petitioner, Baliram s/o Ramaji Ghate, was a landholder whose land was initially covered under the Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976 (C...

High Court

High Court Adjudicates Public Interest Petition Against Ministerial Orders on Land Reservation for Pune Telephones and Cooperative Housing Societies. The Court Considers Legality of Compromise Order and Subsequent Land Acquisition Proceedings in Light of Development Plan and ULC Act Provisions.

24 Apr 2006

The petitioners, residents of Pune, filed a public interest petition under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging the order dated 6.2.1991 (a com...

High Court

Bombay High Court Heard Public Interest Petition Challenging Orders Releasing Reserved Land for Pune Telephones. The Petition Alleged Violation of Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976 and Land Acquisition Act, 1894 in Grant of Compensation to Non-Owners.

24 Apr 2006

The petitioners, residents of Pune, moved this public interest petition under Article 226 of the Constitution, challenging orders that allegedly illeg...

1 2 3 4

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)