Search Results for "Summary Procedure"

2458 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2458 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Motor Accident Claims Tribunal Dismissal of Claim Petition. Tribunal's Failure to Decide Quantum of Compensation and Misapplication of Standard of Proof Held Contrary to Law Under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The appellant, widow of Jose Oliviero, filed a claim petition before the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Goa, seeking compensation for the death of he...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Criticizes Motor Accident Claims Tribunal for Not Deciding Quantum and Following Outdated Precedents. Tribunal Dismissed Claim Petition on Negligence Grounds But Failed to Assess Compensation, Violating Duty to Decide All Issues Under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 169(2).

The appeal arose from a Motor Accident Claims Tribunal award dated 07.01.2021, which dismissed Claim Petition No.112/2017 filed by the appellant, a wi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes 'C' Summary Report in Cheating Case — Directs Further Investigation Under Section 173(8) CrPC. Court finds that the investigating officer failed to examine crucial documents and witnesses, rendering the summary report premature and based on incomplete investigation.

The petitioner, Dharmil Anil Bodani, filed a criminal writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India and Section 482 of the Code of Crim...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes 'B' Summary Order for Lack of Hearing to Complainant and Non-Application of Mind. Magistrate directed to decide afresh after hearing complainant and passing speaking order.

The petitioner, Nitin K. Muchhala, Director of Unity Pharma P. Ltd., challenged an order dated 4th December 2003 passed by the Metropolitan Magistrate...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Removal of Executive Engineer in MSEDCL Bribery Case — Summary Dismissal Procedure Valid. Demand and Acceptance of Rs.50,000 Bribe for Clearing Contractor's Bills Constitutes Serious Misconduct Warranting Removal from Service.

The petitioner, Sudhakar Shankar Chapke, was appointed as a Junior Engineer in the Maharashtra State Electricity Board in 1982 and was promoted to Exe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Conviction in Consumer Protection Act Penalty Case for Violation of Summary Trial Procedure. Failure to Record Plea and Conduct Trial as Per Sections 254 and 262 CrPC Renders Proceedings Void.

The petitioner, Suhas Ratnakar Morey, was convicted by the Maharashtra State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (State Commission) under Section 2...