Search Results for "Sugarcane (Control) Order, 1966"

22 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 22 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Sugar Mills' Challenge to Cess Notification on Sugarcane. State Notification Under Section 3 of Maharashtra Agricultural Produce (Development and Regulation) Act, 1965 Held Ultra Vires Due to Repugnancy with Sugarcane (Control) Order, 1966 Under Essential Commodities Act, 1955.

The petitioners, seven sugar mills in Maharashtra, challenged a Government notification dated 22.3.2018 issued under Section 3 of the Maharashtra Agri...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR Against Two Brothers in IT Act Case — IPC Offences Not Maintainable in Light of Section 67 of IT Act. Non-obstante clause in Section 81 of IT Act overrides IPC for offences involving obscene electronic material, following Sharat Babu Digumarti v. Government (NCT of Delhi).

The petitioners, two brothers, filed a criminal writ petition seeking quashing of FIR No. 86 of 2018 registered at Shahupuri Police Station, Kolhapur,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Sugar Mill Licensing Case — Aerial Distance Certificate Requirement Not Applicable to Defunct Factory. Clause 6A of Sugarcane (Control) Order, 1966 Requires Existing and Operating Sugar Factory for Distance Calculation.

The appellant, Bhavna Agro Products and Services Private Limited, sought to establish a sugar mill and applied for an Aerial Distance Certificate unde...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Bank to Participate in Auction of Attached Sugar Stock in Workers' Dues Recovery Case. The court held that the direction to recover under MLR Code was beyond Section 33C(1) of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, but permitted the bank to participate in auction of attached sugar.

The Maharashtra State Cooperative Bank Ltd. (petitioner) had advanced loans to Yashwant Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana (respondent No.4), a sugar factory, a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Search Committee Appointment for Vice Chancellor of Pune University. UGC Regulations, 2010 Held Directory, Not Mandatory, for Appointment Under Maharashtra Universities Act, 1994.

This Public Interest Litigation (PIL) was filed by Suresh Patilkhede challenging the appointment of the Search Committee for recommending a panel for ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Challenge to Sugar Commissioner's Refusal of Aerial Distance Certificate for New Sugar Factory. Court Upholds Commissioner's Decision Based on Non-Compliance with Minimum Distance Requirement Under Sugarcane Control Order, 1966.

The petitioner, Sangmeshwar Sugar Limited, a company registered under the Companies Act, 1956, sought to establish a new sugar factory at Sonegaon, Ya...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition of Company in Agricultural Marketing Act Case — Processed Goods Not Covered. Notification Adding Sugar, Dry Fruits, and Edible Oils to Schedule Under Section 62 of Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing (Regulation) Act, 1963 Held Ultra Vires.

The petitioner, Britannia Industries Limited, a public company with its registered office in Calcutta and a branch in Bombay, filed a writ petition un...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Sugar Factory Petitions Challenging Levy Sugar Price Fixation Under Essential Commodities Act. Court upholds government's power to fix levy sugar price based on statutory provisions and policy considerations.

The judgment concerns two writ petitions filed by cooperative sugar factories challenging the price fixed by the Central Government for levy sugar und...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Bank and Sugar Factory's Petitions Challenging Auction of Cooperative Sugar Factory Assets. Held that the Bank as a secured creditor has a paramount charge over the property and the auction sale cannot be set aside after confirmation and payment.

The case involves a dispute over the auction sale of assets of Doulat Shetkari Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd., a cooperative sugar factory, by the Kolh...