Search Results for "State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission"

297 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 297 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Consumer Dispute Over Housing Loan Disbursement — No Privity of Contract Between Complainant and Bank. Complainant Not a 'Consumer' Under Section 2(1)(d) of Consumer Protection Act, 1986 as No Service Was Hired or Availed from the Appellant Bank.

The present appeal arises from a consumer complaint filed by the respondent (original complainant) against the appellant bank before the National Cons...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeals by Bar Bodies and Advocate, Holding Advocates Not Liable Under Consumer Protection Act. Legal Profession is Sui Generis and Excluded from Definition of 'Service' Under Consumer Protection Act, 1986/2019.

The Supreme Court considered a batch of appeals arising from an order of the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC) which held that c...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Consumer Dispute Over Telecom Service Provider Jurisdiction - Section 7B of Indian Telegraph Act, 1885 Does Not Bar Consumer Forums from Adjudicating Disputes with Private Service Providers Under Consumer Protection Act, 1986.

The civil appeal originated from a judgment of the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC) dated 26 May 2016, which affirmed the juris...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal by Seed Company, Upholds Consumer Status of Small Agriculturist in Buyback Dispute. Cultivation of Safed Musli for Livelihood Held Not Commercial Purpose Under Section 2(d) of Consumer Protection Act, 1986.

The case involves a dispute between M/s Nandan Biomatrix Ltd., a seed company, and S. Ambika Devi, a small landholder. In 2003, the appellant advertis...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal by Condominium Association for Lack of Locus Standi Under Consumer Protection Act. Statutory Body Formed Under Karnataka Apartment Ownership Act, 1972 Is Not a Voluntary Consumer Association or Consumer Under Section 12 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986.

The appellant, Sobha Hibiscus Condominium, is a statutory body formed under the Karnataka Apartment Ownership Act, 1972, comprising owners of apartmen...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Builder's Appeals in Consumer Cases, Sets Aside Refund Order. Clause 11.4 of Builder-Buyer Agreement Limits Developer's Liability to Refund Only if Agreement is Terminated; Allottees Not Entitled to Refund Without Termination.

The appeals arise from a common judgment of the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC) in ten consumer cases filed by allottees again...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Against Directors in Cheque Dishonour Case Due to Lack of Vicarious Liability. Directors Not in Charge of Day-to-Day Operations Cannot Be Prosecuted Under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Without Specific Allegations.

The petitioners, who were directors of Shri Sainath Nagri Sahakari Path Sanstha Ltd. (a cooperative bank), filed a writ petition under Article 226 of ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Consumer Forum Jurisdiction Over Cooperative Credit Societies. Members of Managing Committees Cannot Claim Immunity from Consumer Forum Orders as Cooperative Credit Societies Provide Services for Remuneration.

This group of writ petitions was filed by members of managing committees of cooperative credit societies challenging the jurisdiction of the District ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Consumer Forum Order Against Credit Society for Deficiency in Service. Fixed Deposit Holder is a Consumer Under Section 2(1) of Consumer Protection Act, 1986.

The petitioners, including the Kala Hanuman Urban Credit Society and its directors, challenged an order dated 25 February 2009 passed by the District ...