Search Results for "Singapore International Arbitration Centre"

42 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 42 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Municipal Corporation's Appeal in Arbitration Case Upholding Arbitral Award. Challenge to Tribunal's Constitution Fails as 30-Day Appointment Period in Arbitration Agreement is Directory, Not Mandatory, Under Sections 16, 34, and 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The dispute originated from a consultancy agreement dated 18 September 1995 between the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai (MCGM) and Respondent ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Section 9 Jurisdiction in International Commercial Arbitration — Implied Party Finding Set Aside. Part I of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 applies to pre-BALCO agreements, but non-signatory cannot be treated as implied party without express consent.

The petitioners, GL Asia Mauritius II Cayman Limited and others, filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 21/08/2010 passed by the District Ju...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Section 9 Interim Relief in Foreign Award Enforcement. Court Confirms Injunction Restraining Alienation of Helicopter Pending Enforcement of Singapore Award Under Part II of Arbitration Act, 1996.

The respondent, Aircon Feibars FZE, obtained a foreign award in Singapore on 25 January 2017 for approximately US$7 million (Rs.46 Crores) against the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

WRIT PETITION NO. 10475 OF 2011

The case involved a partnership firm (Petitioner) engaged in manufacturing soft gelatin pharmaceutical products, and a US corporation (Respondent No.1...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Under Section 11 of Arbitration Act to Appoint Arbitrator Despite Alleged Non-Payment of Stamp Duty on Agreement. Court holds that stamp duty is a fiscal matter and not a bar to appointment of arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The petitioner, Lloyds Realty Developers Limited, filed a petition under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking appointment ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Section 34 Petitions Challenging Arbitral Awards in Share Purchase Agreement Dispute. Court upholds arbitral tribunal's findings on fraud, jurisdiction, and liability, rejecting allegations of perversity and violation of natural justice.

The judgment concerns two arbitration petitions filed under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, by Avitel Post Studioz Ltd. and ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Foreign Award — Part I of Arbitration Act Inapplicable. Section 34 petition under Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 held not maintainable for foreign award with seat in London.

The appeal arose from an order of a learned single Judge of the Bombay High Court dismissing the appellant's arbitration petition under section 34 of ...