Search Results for "Shops and Commercial Establishments Act"

105 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 105 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds High Court Judgment Setting Aside Appellate Authority Order Under Madhya Pradesh Shops & Establishments Act, 1958. The Court affirmed that clubs not being residential clubs are exempt from the Act under Section 3(j), rendering the Appellate Authority's reinstatement order invalid.

The dispute arose from the termination of services of the appellants, who were employees at a club run by the respondents. The appellants filed a comp...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal of Housing Society Against ESI Corporation — Society Not a 'Shop' Under ESI Act Notification. Principles of Natural Justice Not Applicable to Notification Under Section 1(5) of Employees' State Insurance Act, 1948.

The appellant, Vidarbha Premier Co-operative Housing Society, filed an appeal against the order of the Employees' State Insurance Court, Nagpur, which...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows ESI Corporation's Appeal, Holds Software Development as Manufacturing Process Under ESI Act. Computer software development is a manufacturing process under Section 2(k) Factories Act, 1948, making employees eligible for ESI coverage.

The judgment concerns two appeals filed against orders of the Employees' Insurance Court, Mumbai, which had held that computer software development co...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Challenge to Gratuity Award in Public Trust Case. Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 applies to public trusts registered under Bombay Public Trust Act, and establishment coverage depends on employing more than ten employees.

The petitioner, Amravati Nagar Vachanalaya, a public trust registered under the Bombay Public Trust Act, challenged the order of the Additional Commis...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Clubbing of Establishments Under EPF Act. Common Ownership and Same Telephone Number Justify Clubbing for Coverage Under Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952.

The petitioner, M/s. Kiran Agencies, a proprietary firm engaged in pharmaceutical distribution, challenged the order dated 30.03.2005 passed by the Em...