Search Results for "Seed Inspector"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Claimant in Motor Accident Case — Functional Di...
Supreme Court Modifies Sentence in Forgery Case Due to Long Pendency and No Crim...
Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Partition Suit — Concurrent Findi...
High Court of Bombay at Bombay Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Acc...

Search Results for "Seed Inspector"

25 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 25 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Against Seed Company Officials in Seeds Act Violation Case. Court holds that vicarious liability cannot be imposed on officers without specific averments of their role in the alleged offence under Section 6(b) read with Section 7 of the Seeds Act, 1966.

6 Apr 2017

The petitioners, M/s Mahyco Vegetable Seeds Ltd. (a seed producer), its Deputy Manager (Legal) M.M. Chavan, and Senior Manager (SDM) Anil Kolte, chall...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Seeds Act Proceedings for Non-Compliance with Mandatory Sampling Procedure. Failure to Follow Section 14(2) of Seeds Act, 1966 Renders Complaint Invalid.

11 Jan 2019

The petitioner, Mohan H. Handral, filed a petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr.P.C.) seeking to quash the proceeding...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeal in Food Adulteration Case Due to Discrepancy Between Analyst Reports and Non-Compliance with Sampling Rules. Acquittal of Accused Upheld as Prosecution Failed to Prove Adulteration Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954.

11 Jul 2012

The State of Maharashtra, through the Food Inspector, appealed against the judgment and order dated 11/10/2000 passed by the 6th Judicial Magistrate F...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings in Seed Quality Case Due to Lack of Sanction Under Seeds Act, 1966. Police Investigation into Seed Quality Without Complaint by Seed Inspector Held Without Jurisdiction.

13 Jun 2013

The petitioners, Padmakar Haribhau Mulay and others, filed a criminal writ petition challenging the FIR and charge-sheet in R.C.C.No.276/2000 pending ...

High Court

High Court Quashes Criminal Case Against Applicants in Cotton Seeds Fraud and Forgery Case Due to Insufficient Evidence and Lack of Offence Ingredients Under IPC and Other Acts

16 Feb 2026

The High Court quashed criminal proceedings against the Applicants in a case involving alleged offences related to prohibited cotton seeds. The Applic...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeal in Food Adulteration Case Due to Non-Compliance with Sampling Procedure. Failure to Follow Rule 14 of Prevention of Food Adulteration Rules, 1955 Regarding Proper Mixing and Sampling Renders Prosecution Unsustainable.

9 Jul 2012

The State of Maharashtra, through Food Inspector S.G. Dharme, filed an appeal against the judgment and order dated 10/05/2000 passed by the 6th Judici...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Acquittal in Food Adulteration Case Due to Non-Compliance with Sampling Procedure. Failure to Follow Rule 22 of Prevention of Food Adulteration Rules, 1955 Regarding Mixing and Dividing Sample Renders Prosecution Unsustainable.

10 Feb 2005

The State of Maharashtra, through Food Inspector M.M. Acharya, filed an appeal against the judgment and order dated 11/8/1992 passed by the Judicial M...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Acquittal in Food Adulteration Case Due to Denial of Right to Re-Analysis. Accused Acquitted as Sample Became Unfit for Analysis Under Section 13(2) of Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954.

6 Mar 2018

The State of Maharashtra filed three appeals against the acquittal of the accused Harishchandra Sadhuram Agarwal, a vendor and proprietor of a kirana ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Criminal Case Against Directors and Company in Food Adulteration Matter Due to Lack of Vicarious Liability. Failure to Show That Accused Were In Charge of and Responsible for Business Conduct at Time of Offence Under Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954.

10 Jul 2014

The applicants, who were directors and a company (Marico Industries Ltd.), filed an application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Land Title Dispute Against Government — Holds That Government Cannot Unilaterally Resume Land Without Following Due Process and Payment of Compensation. Court Restores Trial Court Decree Declaring Appellants' Title Based on Valid Sale Deed and Pattadar Passbook, Setting Aside High Court's Reversal.

24 Mar 2025

The case involves a dispute over 3.34 acres of land in Kurnool District, Andhra Pradesh. The appellants claimed title through a chain of transactions ...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)