Search Results for "Section 43-A Notification"

30 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 30 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Adjudicates Writ Petition Challenging Transfer Order of Workman for Alleged Violation of Certified Standing Orders. Petition Raises Question Whether Inter-Unit Transfer is Permissible Under Standing Order Clause 7 and Industrial Employment (Standing Orders) Act, 1946.

The petitioners, a Junior Section Officer employee (first petitioner) and a registered Trade Union (second petitioner), challenged an inter-unit trans...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Hears Writ Petitions Challenging Karnataka On-Demand Transportation Technology Aggregators Rules, 2016. Petitioners Allege Rules Are Ultra Vires Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 and Violate Fundamental Rights.

The writ petitions arose from the notification of the Karnataka On-Demand Transportation Technology Aggregators Rules, 2016, by the State Government o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Pronounces Order on Constitutional Challenge to Karnataka On-demand Transportation Technology Aggregators Rules, 2016. Petitioners Assert Rules Ultra Vires Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 and Violative of Freedom of Trade and Commerce Under Articles 14, 19(1)(g), and 301 of the Constitution.

The Karnataka High Court considered a batch of writ petitions challenging the constitutional validity of the Karnataka On-demand Transportation Techno...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Examines Cut-off Date for Workmen Dues in Winding Up of Swadeshi Mills. Official Liquidator's Calculation Up to Appointment of Provisional Liquidator Challenged by Workmen Seeking Dues Up to Winding Up Order.

The matter concerns a company application filed by five workmen of M/s Swadeshi Mills Co. Ltd., which was wound up. The company had approximately 2970...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Hears Arbitration Petition Under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Award of 14 January 2006 on Share Valuation Under Clause 7 of Protocol Agreement Challenged on Grounds of Jurisdiction and Legality of the Agreement.

The matter arose from a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 filed by Western Maharashtra Development Corpn. Ltd. c...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

"Landmark Judgment on Property Rights and Public Welfare in Mumbai" "Balancing property ownership with the collective good under India's constitutional framework."

The Supreme Court examined whether Chapter VIII-A of the MHADA Act aligns with the principles of Article 39(b) of the Indian Constitution, which aims ...