Search Results for "Section 34 Petition"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Case — Death Not Arising O...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Challenge to Arbitral Award in Commerci...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Attachment of Property in NSEL Scam C...
Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Customs Classification Dispute — Bulk Pet F...

Search Results for "Section 34 Petition"

36 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 36 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Stock Broker Dispute — No Interference Under Section 34 of Arbitration Act as Award Not Found to be Patently Illegal or Contrary to Public Policy. The court upheld the arbitrator's findings of fact and declined to re-appreciate evidence, reaffirming the limited scope of judicial review under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

9 Dec 2025

The petitioner, Sharekhan Limited, a stock broker, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 challenging an arbi...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Section 34 Petition Challenging Arbitral Award Rejecting Contractor's Claims for Railway Maintenance Contract. Court upholds award on grounds of no patent illegality or perversity, finding that the arbitrator's decision was based on proper appreciation of evidence and contractual terms.

8 Dec 2025

The petitioner, M/s. Amit Engineers, a government contractor, was awarded a work order by the Central Railway for an annual maintenance contract of RM...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal Against Arbitral Award in Construction Dispute — No Interference Under Section 34 of Arbitration Act as Award Not Perverse or Contrary to Public Policy. Court upholds commercial court's refusal to set aside award, finding no grounds under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

17 Apr 2021

The Union of India, represented by the Executive Engineer of the Central Public Works Department, filed an appeal under Section 13(1A) of the Commerci...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Additional Documents in Arbitration Petition Despite Delay, Subject to Costs — Charge-Sheet Filed Against Contractor Relevant to Dispute Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

22 Oct 2019

The judgment concerns two notices of motion filed in pending commercial arbitration petitions under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Dismisses Section 34 Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Favor of Government of Israel in Commercial Lease Dispute. Arbitrator's Rejection of Set-Off and Counter-Claim as Time-Barred Upheld as Not Patently Illegal.

6 Sep 2019

The petitioner, Earnest Business Services Private Limited, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 challenging...

High Court

Bombay High Court Partially Allows Section 34 Petition Against Arbitral Award in Commercial Supply Dispute — Upholds Award on Unpaid Invoices but Sets Aside Interest Rate. Arbitrator's findings on oral contracts and quantum of supplies upheld as not patently illegal under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

6 May 2015

The petitioner, Royal Palms (India) Private Limited, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 challenging an ar...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Co-operative Bank Loan Dispute. Court upholds award holding borrowers jointly and severally liable for Rs.9.88 crore with interest under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

6 May 2015

The petitioners, Abid & Company Steels Private Limited and its directors, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1...

High Court

Bombay High Court Partially Sets Aside Arbitral Award in Sponsorship Dispute — Holds Arbitrator Exceeded Jurisdiction by Awarding Interest Without Agreement and Rejecting Counterclaim Without Proper Consideration. The court found that the arbitrator's award of interest at 18% per annum was contrary to the Deal Memo which provided for interest at 18% per annum only after 30 days of default, and that the rejection of the counterclaim for damages due to alleged breach of exclusivity was not supported by reasons.

17 Dec 2014

The petitioner, Rashmi Housing Private Limited, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an arbitr...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses Petition Challenging Amendment of Section 34 Arbitration Petition — Delay in Filing Amendment Not Fatal as Amendment Only Clarified Existing Grounds Without Causing Prejudice.

14 Oct 2014

The petitioner, Inox Leisure Limited, challenged an order dated 07/09/2013 passed by the Principal District Judge, Panaji, which allowed an amendment ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Single Judge's Ruling on Lack of Jurisdiction in Section 34 Petition — Seat of Arbitration Determines Exclusive Jurisdiction Under Section 2(1)(e) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

22 Jul 2013

The appeal arose from a judgment of a learned Single Judge of the Bombay High Court, who held that the court had no jurisdiction to entertain a petiti...

1 2 3 4

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)