Search Results for "Section 28AB"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "Section 28AB"

22 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 22 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petitions Challenging Customs Duty Demand on Jewellery Exports from SEZ — Held that goods manufactured in SEZ and exported are not liable to customs duty under Section 2(23) of the Customs Act, 1962 read with SEZ Act, 2005. The court ruled that the SEZ Act, 2005 is a complete code and overrides the Customs Act, and the demand of duty was contrary to the scheme of the SEZ Act.

19 Nov 2022

The petitioners, M/s. Renaissance Global Limited and M/s. Gold Star Jewellery Designs Pvt. Ltd., are companies engaged in the manufacture and export o...

High Court

Bombay High Court Partly Allows Writ Petition Against Settlement Commission in Anti-Dumping Duty Case; Sets Aside Adjustment of Time-Barred Demand and Imposition of Penalty on Partner. Settlement Commission Cannot Allow Recovery of Duty Beyond Five-Year Limitation Period Under Section 28(4) of Customs Act, 1962, and Penalty on Partner Requires Specific Show Cause Notice.

4 Aug 2017

The petitioner, a partnership firm engaged in importing solvents and chemicals, challenged an order of the Settlement Commission, Customs and Central ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Refers Conflict Between High Courts on Settlement Commission Jurisdiction Under Customs Act — Personal Liberty and Right to Settle Disputes Under Chapter XIVA of Customs Act, 1962. The Court directed the matter to be placed before the Chief Justice of India due to divergence of opinion between Bombay and Delhi High Courts on whether an accused can approach the Settlement Commission after arrest.

4 May 2023

The present writ petition was filed by Yamal Manojbhai, a Non-Resident Indian (NRI), under Article 32 of the Constitution of India, raising an issue o...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Customs Appeal by Patel Engineering Ltd in Import Misdeclaration Case. Confiscation of Goods and Penalty Upheld for Violation of Sections 111(d) and (m) of Customs Act, 1962.

30 Jun 2014

The appellant, Patel Engineering Ltd, filed a Customs Appeal under Section 130 of the Customs Act, 1962, challenging the concurrent findings of the Ad...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Customs Duty Demand on Re-exported Leased Capital Goods. Petitioner failed to comply with conditions of Notification No. 21/2002-Cus. for duty-free import of capital goods on lease, and re-exported goods without fulfilling export obligation, leading to demand of duty and interest.

7 Jul 2022

The petitioner, Expotec International Ltd., a public limited company engaged in import and export, was awarded a contract by Gas Authority of India Li...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Customs Order-in-Original for Violation of Natural Justice — Petitioner Denied Cross-Examination Opportunity Under Section 138B of Customs Act, 1962. The court held that denial of cross-examination vitiates the proceedings and remitted the matter for fresh adjudication.

5 Dec 2023

The petitioner, Shri Bipin Badani, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court challenging the o...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Customs Order-in-Original for Violation of Natural Justice — Petitioner Denied Opportunity to Cross-Examine Witnesses Under Section 138B of Customs Act, 1962. The court held that breach of natural justice renders the order invalid and remitted the matter for fresh adjudication.

5 Dec 2023

The petitioner, Shri Bipin Badani, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court challenging an or...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Settlement Commission's Majority Decision Rejecting Settlement Application in Customs Duty Evasion Case. Majority view prevails over minority view under Section 127I of the Customs Act, 1962 when there is a difference of opinion among Members.

16 Sep 2016

The petitioners, Under Water Services Company Limited and others, filed a Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal of 100% EOU in Customs Duty Case for Unauthorized DTA Sales of Cut Flowers. Cut Flowers Held Non-Excisable, Duty Leviable on Inputs Under Notification No. 126/94-Cus as Amended, Extended Limitation Period Invoked for Wilful Suppression.

1 Sep 2020

The appeal arises from a dispute between M/s. L.R. Brothers Indo Flora Ltd., a 100% Export Oriented Unit (EOU) engaged in floriculture, and the Commis...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Commissioner of Customs' Appeal Against Tribunal's Order Setting Aside Anti-Dumping Duty Demand. Tribunal Correctly Found Show Cause Notices Lacked Basis for Reclassification and Anti-Dumping Notification Did Not Cover Goods Under Declared Tariff Heading CTH 40021100 Under Customs Tariff Act, 1975.

21 Sep 2021

The Supreme Court of India heard civil appeals filed by the Commissioner of Customs, Pune against a judgment of the Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appe...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)