Search Results for "Section 284 IPC"

65 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 65 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Quashes Bail Order in Murder Conviction Appeal Due to Lack of Exceptional Circumstances. High Court Erred in Granting Suspension of Sentence Under Section 389 CrPC Without Considering Serious Nature of Offence Under Section 302 IPC and Trial Court Findings.

The dispute arose from a criminal appeal filed by the informant, challenging the High Court's order that suspended the life sentence and granted bail ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Acquits Husband in Dowry Death Case Due to Lack of Evidence of Cruelty and Abetment. Conviction under Sections 498A and 306 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove harassment or instigation leading to suicide.

The appellant, Dilipbhai Manglabhai Varli, was convicted by the learned District Judge, Valsad, in Sessions Case No.90 of 2002 for offences under Sect...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Acquits KSRTC Driver in Road Accident Case Due to Lack of Rash or Negligent Driving Evidence. Conviction under Sections 279 and 304A IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Culpable Rashness or Negligence Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Mohammad Hanif Jainum Khalifa, was a driver employed by the Karnataka State Road Transport Corporation (KSRTC). He was tried and convic...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Grants Bail to Accused in Murder Case Due to Lack of Prima Facie Evidence of Conspiracy and Long Incarceration. Petitioners Accused of Murder Under Section 302 IPC and Conspiracy Under Section 120B IPC Granted Bail Under Section 439 CrPC.

The petitioners, accused nos.1 to 3, filed a criminal petition under Section 439 CrPC seeking regular bail in connection with Crime No.09/2019 registe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in POCSO and Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 376 IPC and Section 4 of POCSO Act, 2012 set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, G S Venkatesh, was convicted by the I Additional District and Sessions Judge, Chikkaballapur, in Special S.C. No.12/2016 for offences p...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR in Cheque Dishonour Case Due to Non-Compliance with Mandatory Notice Requirements Under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. Failure to Serve Valid Notice Within 15 Days of Dishonour Renders Complaint Not Maintainable.

The petitioner, Mohd. Jahir Mohd. Shikur, filed a Criminal Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Absence of Public Witness. Conviction under Section 302 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The case pertains to the conviction of three appellants, Sadashiv Babu Patil, Sambhaji Sadashiv Patil, and Shivaji Sadashiv Patil, under Section 302 o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Charge-Sheet Against Forest Officers in Abetment of Suicide Case — No Proximate Link Between Alleged Acts and Suicide. Suicide Note Did Not Name Petitioners; Allegations of Harassment Vague and Unsubstantiated, Not Attracting Section 306 IPC.

The petitioners, Deepak Prabhakarrao Chondekar, Rajendra Madhukar Tongo, and Sopan Marotirao Potulwar, were forest officers serving in Pandharkawda, D...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Murder Case Due to Unlawful Assembly and Common Objection Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt. Conviction under Section 302 read with Section 149 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to establish that the appellants shared the common object to commit murder.

The appellants were convicted by the Special Judge & Additional Sessions Judge, Nagpur, in Special Case No. 19 of 2004 for the offence punishable unde...