Search Results for "Section 25F compliance"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "Section 25F compliance"

167 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 167 result(s)

High Court

Karnataka High Court Adjudicates Writ Petition Challenging Transfer Order of Workman for Alleged Violation of Certified Standing Orders. Petition Raises Question Whether Inter-Unit Transfer is Permissible Under Standing Order Clause 7 and Industrial Employment (Standing Orders) Act, 1946.

13 Sep 2022

The petitioners, a Junior Section Officer employee (first petitioner) and a registered Trade Union (second petitioner), challenged an inter-unit trans...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Municipal Council's Writ Petitions Challenging Labour Court Awards in Retrenchment Compensation Cases. Held that Section 25F of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 does not require a separate notice of retrenchment when compensation is tendered along with notice pay, and that the Labour Court's finding of non-compliance with Section 25F was perverse.

30 Nov -0001

The Municipal Council Jintur filed multiple writ petitions challenging the awards of the Labour Court, which had set aside the retrenchment of several...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Industrial Court's Order Holding Retrenchment as Unfair Labour Practice. Non-compliance with Section 25F of Industrial Disputes Act renders retrenchment illegal and amounts to unfair labour practice under Item 9 of Schedule IV of MRTU & PULP Act.

3 Mar 2006

The petitioner, Shekoba Auto Private Ltd., a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956, was engaged in the manufacture of automobile ignition...

High Court

Gujarat High Court Quashes Termination of Daily Wager for Non-Compliance with Section 25F of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 — Retrenchment Invalid as No Notice or Compensation Given Despite 240 Days of Continuous Service. The court held that termination of a daily wager without complying with Section 25F of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is illegal and void ab initio, and directed reinstatement with continuity of service and 30% backwages.

9 Feb 2026

The petitioner, Mansukhbhai Bhupatbhai Jadhav, was a daily wager employed by the respondent authorities (State of Gujarat and others) from 1991. He wa...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Air India's Restructuring and Transfer of Employees to Subsidiaries. Transfer of employees to wholly owned subsidiaries held not to be closure or retrenchment under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

30 Nov -0001

The Bombay High Court dismissed a batch of writ petitions filed by various trade unions and associations of employees of Air India Limited challenging...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses MTNL's Petition Challenging Reinstatement of Casual Labourer for Violation of Section 25F of Industrial Disputes Act. Termination Without Notice or Compensation Renders Retrenchment Illegal, and MTNL is an Industry Under Section 2(j).

8 Jul 2010

The petitioner, Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Ltd. (MTNL), challenged an award of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal (CGIT) No. II, Mumbai, which ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Petition Challenging Labour Court Award of Reinstatement Without Back Wages for Workman Terminated in Violation of Section 25F of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. Workman's Proof of 240 Days Continuous Service and Employer's Failure to Produce Records Justified Adverse Inference and Reinstatement.

21 Feb 2011

The case involves a writ petition filed by the Executive Engineer, Public Works Department, Wardha (employer) challenging an award of the Labour Court...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Municipal Council's Challenge to Labour Court Awards in Retrenchment Compensation Cases. Held that Section 25F of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 does not require a separate notice of retrenchment when the employee has already been terminated and the termination is set aside, and that the workmen are entitled to reinstatement with continuity of service and back wages.

19 Dec 2016

The Municipal Council, Tirora, through its Chief Officer and President, filed multiple writ petitions challenging the common award dated 30th June 200...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Retrenchment of Chaukidar by Public Works Department for Non-compliance with Section 25F of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 — Employer Failed to Pay Retrenchment Compensation at Time of Termination.

17 Jul 2015

The case involves two writ petitions arising from the same order of the Industrial Court, Akola. The petitioner in Writ Petition No.5036/2014, Ganesh ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows State's Petition Challenging Reinstatement of Daily-Wager — No Evidence of Section 25G Violation. Labour Court's finding of continuous service under Section 25B of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 upheld, but reinstatement set aside for lack of proof that juniors were retained.

20 Feb 2015

The State of Maharashtra, through the Executive Engineer, P.W.D. (North), Jalgaon, filed a writ petition challenging the Award dated 5.4.1994 passed b...

1 2 3 4

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)