Search Results for "Section 25-G"

53 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 53 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Industrial Court's Reversal of Reinstatement Order in Unfair Labour Practice Case. Termination of Probationers Without Inquiry Held Illegal Under MRTU & PULP Act, 1971.

The petitioners, Chandan Bapurao Karwade and Rajesh Bharatlal Pande, were appointed on 18 April 1995 as Accountant and Instructor respectively in a te...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Compensation Over Reinstatement for Daily Wage Employee in Unfair Labour Practice Case. Refusal of reinstatement and back wages upheld as employee worked only for 4 years and compensation of Rs. 25,000 deemed adequate under MRTU & PULP Act, 1971.

The petitioner, Jagdish s/o Karuji Bombarde, was a daily wage employee of the Municipal Council, Tumsar. He was appointed in February 1997, transferre...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Employer's Petition in Unfair Labour Practice Case — Remands for Fresh Adjudication on Punitive Termination. Punitive termination is not retrenchment under Section 2(oo) of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947; Labour Court misapplied Sections 25F and 25G.

The petitioner, Nandura Urban Cooperative Bank Ltd., challenged the orders of the Labour Court and Industrial Court which had allowed the complaint of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Compensation in Lieu of Reinstatement for Unfair Termination of Temporary Employee. Termination of a peon appointed on compassionate basis held invalid, but compensation of Rs.25,000 deemed adequate given short service and nature of appointment.

The petitioner, Sandip Pandurang Nannaware, was appointed as a peon on 01/01/2002 in place of his father at Shrigonda Krishi Utpana Bazar Samiti. His ...