Search Results for "Section 160(2)"

19 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 19 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Return of Passport to Accused in Matrimonial Dispute Subject to Conditions. Right to Travel Abroad Recognized as Fundamental Right Under Article 21, But Subject to Reasonable Restrictions Imposed by Criminal Court.

The appellant, Chennupati Kranthi Kumar, is accused no.1 in a prosecution for offences under Sections 498A, 403, and 406 of the Indian Penal Code, 186...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Reduces Sentence of Bus Driver for Breaking Railway Crossing Gate Under Section 160(2) of Railways Act, 1989. Conviction Upheld but Sentence Reduced to Period Already Undergone Due to Nature of Offence and Passage of Time.

The appellant, Nagaraj, was a driver employed by the Karnataka State Road Transport Corporation. On 3 August 2006, while driving a bus, he hit a railw...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Rejection of Interim Relief in SARFAESI Act Case — Civil Suit Held Not Maintainable Due to Bar Under Section 34 of SARFAESI Act. Borrowers Must Avail Remedy Under Section 17 Before DRT Instead of Seeking Injunction in Civil Court.

The case involves an appeal filed by the appellants, who are borrowers and guarantors, against an order of the Commercial Division of the Bombay High ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Seeking Contempt Action Against Judges for Alleged Judicial Misconduct. Court holds that judges cannot be prosecuted for acts done in judicial capacity and that contempt of court proceedings cannot be initiated against judges for their judicial orders.

The petitioners, Common Citizen of India (Common Man) through Rakesh Omprakash Agarwal and Peoples Rights Vigilance Organisation, filed a writ petitio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Cooperative Bank Loan Recovery Case. Court upholds award under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 and Section 84 of Multi-State Cooperative Societies Act, 2002, finding no grounds for interference.

The petitioners, Vedansh Hospitality and Resorts Limited and two individuals, were original respondents in an arbitration proceeding initiated by New ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Property Injunction Case — Suit for Injunction Simpliciter Not Maintainable When Specific Performance Is Available. Section 41(h) of Specific Relief Act, 1963 Bars Injunction Where More Efficacious Relief of Specific Performance Is Not Sought.

The appellant, original defendant no.1, owned a flat. On 6 June 2008, he allegedly agreed to sell it to the respondent no.1 (plaintiff) for Rs.40 lakh...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Municipal Council's Petitions Against Labour Court Awards in Retrenchment Compensation Cases. Held that Section 25F of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 does not require a separate notice of retrenchment when the employee is already aware of the closure of the establishment.

The judgment involves a batch of writ petitions filed by the Municipal Council, Tirora, and its President against common orders passed by the Labour C...