Search Results for "Section 143 Maharashtra Land Revenue Code"

70 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 70 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Land Acquisition Case Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894. Notifications invoking urgency under Section 17(4) and dispensing with inquiry under Section 5A upheld as land was necessary for residential colony scheme and decision based on subjective satisfaction of authority.

The dispute arose from land acquisition proceedings under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, initiated by the State of Uttar Pradesh and the Bulandshhar ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Land Title Dispute — Concurrent Findings Upheld. Patta Validity Requires Proof of Abandonment or Revocation of Earlier Patta Under Madhya Pradesh Land Revenue Code.

The Supreme Court dismissed an appeal arising from a land title dispute in Madhya Pradesh. The respondents-plaintiffs (Shiv Nath and deceased Vishwana...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Assault Case Due to Unreliable Witness Testimony. Conviction under Sections 143, 147, 324, 332 read with 149 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The case involves an appeal against conviction under Sections 143, 147, 324, 332 read with 149 IPC. The prosecution alleged that the appellants formed...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Against Civil Court's Jurisdiction in Saranjam Property Dispute. The court held that the Bombay Rent-Free Estates Act, 1852 and Exemptions from Land Revenue Acts, 1863 do not bar civil court jurisdiction over title and possession of Saranjam properties.

The case involves a Civil Revision Application filed by the original defendant no. 1 challenging an order dated 22 February 2005 passed by the Joint C...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Forest Department's Notice on Private Forest Land. Held that lands restored under Section 22A of Maharashtra Private Forests (Acquisition) Act, 1975 retain status of reserved forest under Indian Forest Act, 1927.

The Petitioner, Sinhagad Technical Education Society, claimed ownership of lands bearing Gat Nos. 310 and 311 at village Kusgaon Budruk, Taluka Maval,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Validity of MRTP Act Provisions. Court holds that Sections 49(7) and 127 of Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 are constitutionally valid and not ultra vires Articles 14, 19(1)(g), 21, 21A, 47 and 243(w).

The petitioners, Chalisgaon Municipal Council and a resident, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging the constitution...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petitioners' Claim for Right of Way Under Section 143 of Maharashtra Land Revenue Code. Sub-Divisional Officer's Remand Order Quashed as Naib Tahsildar Had Conducted Proper Enquiry.

The petitioners, Smt. Vidya Karandikar and Vijay Karandikar, filed a writ petition challenging the order of the Sub-Divisional Officer, Nagpur, dated ...