Search Results for "Section 13(4) Measures"

266 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 266 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

KAHC010366622012_1

...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers State Government's Leave Application for Regularization Policy in PILs. Court Examines Whether Draft Policy Violates MRTP Act and Whether Judicial Review Permits Interference with Policy Decisions.

The proceedings arise from two Public Interest Litigations (PIL No. 80 of 2013 and PIL No. 138 of 2012) before the Bombay High Court. In an earlier or...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Seeking Policy for Section 351 Notices Under MCGM Act as Moot Due to Prior Challenge by BSE. The court held that the petitioner lacked locus standi and the issues were already pending before a Single Bench in a related writ petition.

The petitioner, Dr. V. Aditya Srinivas, an office bearer of BSE Brokers' Forum, filed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) in the Bombay High Court seek...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

KAHC010005522012_1

...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Addresses Challenge to Arbitral Award Granting Damages in Electricity Supply Contract Dispute. Tribunal's Award of Damages for Installed Objects Questioned on Grounds of Fundamental Breach Limited to Uninstalled Units Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The arbitration petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 was filed by Maharashtra State Electricity Board (MSEB) and it...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Nagpur Bench Reviews Industrial Court's Finding of Unfair Labour Practice Against Employer for Denying Permanent Status to Temporary Workers. Court Examines Whether Completion of 240 Days of Continuous Service Under Model Standing Orders Mandates Confirmation.

This batch of writ petitions was filed by Mahindra and Mahindra Ltd. and one employee before the Bombay High Court, Nagpur Bench, challenging a common...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Union of India in Section 17A Challenge — Prior Approval Requirement for Investigating Public Servants is Constitutionally Valid. Read Down to Mandate Independent Screening; Lokpal to Approve for Covered Public Servants.

The writ petition was filed by the Centre for Public Interest Litigation challenging the constitutional validity of Section 17A of the Prevention of C...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Examines Constitutionality of Prohibitory Orders Under Section 144 CrPC Restricting Public Assembly. Judgment Clarifies That Reasonable Restrictions on Speech and Assembly Must Be Just, Fair and Reasonable Under Articles 19 and 21.

The Supreme Court initiated a suo motu criminal writ petition regarding the incident at Ramlila Maidan on 4-5 June 2011, involving the imposition of p...