Search Results for "Section 11D"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "Section 11D"

18 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 18 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Quashing Attachment Notices Against Third-Party Purchaser for Excise Dues of Defaulter. Central Excise Cannot Attach Property Sold Prior to Creation of Dues Without Notice to Purchaser Under Section 11 of Central Excise Act, 1944.

22 Apr 2021

The Petitioner, M/s Runwal Constructions, a partnership firm registered under the Indian Partnership Act, 1932, engaged in construction and developmen...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging SEBI's Rejection of Condonation of Delay in Settlement Applications. SEBI's refusal to condone delay in filing settlement applications under SEBI (Settlement of Administrative and Civil Proceedings) Regulations, 2014 upheld as petitioner failed to show sufficient cause.

4 Sep 2019

The petitioner, New Delhi Television Limited (NDTL), a company engaged in operating news channels, challenged orders dated 23.8.2017 and 31.8.2017 pas...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Service Tax Case: No Time Limit for Stay Application Before Commissioner (Appeals) Under Finance Act, 1994. Tribunal erred in dismissing appeal solely on ground of delay in filing stay application when stay application was filed six months before hearing and waiver of predeposit was pleaded.

30 Apr 2019

The appellant, Siddesh Tours and Travels, a proprietorship firm engaged in renting out cars, had obtained service tax registration under the category ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Suit Rejection Case — Conditional Withdrawal Without Payment of Costs Bars Fresh Suit. Order VII Rule 11(d) CPC applied to reject plaint where earlier suits were withdrawn with permission to file fresh suit but costs condition was not fulfilled.

9 Jan 2014

The appellants, original plaintiffs, filed Special Civil Suit No.30 of 2007 seeking declaration that a sale deed was illegal, null and void. The respo...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Levy of Fees on Transporters and Traders Under Essential Commodities Act for Maintenance of Public Distribution System. The court held that the levy under Section 3(3)(f) of the Essential Commodities Act, 1955 is a valid regulatory fee and not a tax.

13 Dec 2013

The judgment involves multiple writ petitions and civil applications challenging the levy of fees on transporters and traders under the Maharashtra Es...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging KAT Order on Rule 214(3) KCSR — Rule Does Not Bar Criminal Proceedings for Misappropriation of Funds. The court held that Rule 214(3) of the Karnataka Civil Service Rules only bars civil suits or departmental proceedings, not criminal proceedings, and thus the Government's direction to lodge a complaint was valid.

21 Aug 2013

The petitioner, A.K. Chowdekar, a retired Executive Engineer of the Karnataka Road Development Corporation, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 a...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging SEBI Consent Guidelines Requiring Pendency of Proceedings. Requirement of pendency of court proceedings or adjudication for consent applications under SEBI Guidelines is not arbitrary and does not violate Article 14 of the Constitution.

17 Jan 2012

The petitioners, Shilpa Stock Broker Pvt. Ltd. and another, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging the validity of cl...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Revision Application in Rent Control Case — Eviction Set Aside Due to Invalid Notice Under Section 12(3)(a) of the Bombay Rents Act. Notice demanding arrears of rent must give 15 clear days as per Section 106 of Transfer of Property Act, and service on 30th April demanding payment by 15th May does not comply.

30 Nov -0001

The case involves a civil revision application filed by the original defendant No.1, Anil Gangekar, against the judgment and decree of eviction passed...

1 2

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)