Search Results for "Section 11AC"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Partition Suit — Concurrent Findi...
High Court of Bombay at Bombay Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Acc...
Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Notice Under Section 148 of Income Tax Ac...
High Court of Karnataka Allows EPF Organisation's Writ Petition for Priority Pay...

Search Results for "Section 11AC"

20 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 20 result(s)

High Court

Madras High Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Penalty Case for Wrongful DTAA Claim — No Concealment Found. Assessee's Bonafide Belief That India-China DTAA Applied to Hong Kong Based on Official Document Precludes Penalty Under Section 271(1)(c) of Income Tax Act, 1961.

5 Feb 2026

The revenue appealed against the common order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) which set aside the levy of penalty under Section 271(1)(c) ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Tribunal's Predeposit Order in Central Excise Case — Prima Facie Case for Waiver Established. The court held that the Tribunal's direction to deposit Rs. 11.52 lakhs under Section 35F of the Central Excise Act, 1944 was unsustainable as the appellant had made out a strong prima facie case on the issue of suppression of facts and limitation.

26 Jul 2011

The appellant, Vinar Ispat Limited, was engaged in converting billets, blooms, and slabs purchased from various manufacturers on a job work basis into...

High Court

Bombay High Court Partially Allows Petition Against Settlement Commission Order in Central Excise Dispute — Penalty Reduced Due to Full Duty Payment and Co-operation. The court reduced the penalty from Rs. 15 lacs to Rs. 5 lacs under Section 11AC of the Central Excise Act, 1944, as the petitioner had paid the full duty and co-operated.

19 Dec 2012

The petitioner, M/s. Indorama Synthetics (India) Ltd., a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956, challenged an order dated 8/2/2011 of the...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Central Excise Appeals on Cenvat Credit for Input Services Used in Exported Goods. Rule 5 of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 permits refund of credit on input services used in manufacture of exported goods, and the definition of 'input service' under Rule 2(l) includes services used in relation to export.

9 Nov 2011

The judgment involves five appeals filed by four companies (M/s. Orange City Alloys Pvt. Ltd., M/s. Shridhar Castings Pvt. Ltd., M/s. Shiva Steel Indu...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Central Excise Case — Process Not Amounting to Manufacture Under Section 2(f) of Central Excise Act, 1944. Court Holds That Internal Order Deciding Jurisdiction Is Not Appealable Under Section 35 of the Act.

14 Nov 2019

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by the Commissioner of Central Excise, Haldia against the order of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appe...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Predeposit Order in Central Excise Valuation Dispute. CESTAT's direction to deposit Rs. 1 crore set aside as assessee had strong prima facie case on valuation under Section 4 of Central Excise Act, 1944.

21 Mar 2012

The appellant, Jabil Circuit India Private Limited, is a manufacturer of set-top boxes. It sold these boxes to Thomson Holdings India Private Limited ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Revenue's Appeal in Central Excise Case on CENVAT Credit Restriction for Inputs from 100% EOU. Rule 3(6)(a)(i) of CENVAT Credit Rules, 2002 restricts credit on inputs manufactured by a 100% EOU, and reversal under Rule 3(4) does not remove the restriction.

12 Apr 2019

The Commissioner of Central Excise, Raigad filed an appeal under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944 against the order of the Customs, Excise ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Central Excise Case — Appellant Entitled to Cenvat Credit on Input Services. Definition of 'Input Service' Under Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 is Broad and Includes Services Having Nexus with Manufacturing Business.

21 Apr 2021

The appellant, Toyota Kirloskar Motor Private Limited, is a manufacturer of motor vehicles and parts, registered under the Central Excise Act. It file...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against CESTAT Pre-Deposit Order in CENVAT Credit Case — Prima Facie Case for Waiver of Pre-Deposit Established. The Court held that the appellant had made out a strong prima facie case for waiver of pre-deposit under Section 35F of the Central Excise Act, 1944, as the statements relied upon were retracted and no opportunity for cross-examination was given.

8 May 2015

The appellant, Ms. Arjandas Metal Industries Pvt. Ltd., filed an appeal under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944 against an order dated 10th ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Central Excise Case on Third Member Reference and Remand Ambiguity. The court held that the third member cannot go beyond the referred question and the remand order was ambiguous, remanding the matter for fresh consideration.

7 Apr 2006

The case involves an appeal by M/s. Kelkar Trading Corporation and Shri Chintamani Shridhar Kelkar against the Commissioner of Central Excise, Mumbai-...

1 2

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)