Search Results for "Sealed sample"

451 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 451 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in NDPS Case Due to Non-Compliance with Section 42 of NDPS Act, 1985. Secret Information Not Forwarded to Superior Officer, Search Vitiated.

The appellant, Kallumal Jaidmal Kukareja @ Kallumama, was convicted by the NDPS Special Judge, Greater Bombay, for an offence punishable under Section...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings in Seeds Act Case Due to Non-Compliance with Mandatory Sampling Procedure. Failure to Follow Section 14(2) of Seeds Act, 1966 Renders Prosecution Invalid.

The applicants, Ajeet Seeds Ltd., M/s Bhushan Agro Agencies, and M/s Bharatkumar Purushottam Potdar, filed a criminal application under Section 482 of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeal in Food Adulteration Case Due to Non-Compliance with Sampling Rules. Acquittal of Vendor for Selling Adulterated Groundnut Oil Upheld as Sample Not Representative and Rules 14 and 16 of Prevention of Food Adulteration Rules, 1955 Not Followed.

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the judgment and order of the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Bramhapuri, in Regular Criminal Case No.68 of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Summons in Seeds Act Case for Non-Compliance with Mandatory Sampling Procedure. Failure to Give Notice Under Rule 7(1) of Seeds Rules, 1968 Before Drawing Sample Renders Prosecution Invalid.

The petitioners, Vishwas Pandhari Khuje, Rajendra Bhikanrao Deshmukh, and Ramdas Dnyandev Kadam, filed a Criminal Writ Petition before the Bombay High...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision of Accused in Food Adulteration Case — Groundnut Oil Sample Found Adulterated. Accused Failed to Prove Due Diligence Under Section 19(2) of Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954.

The case arises from a criminal revision application filed by Kantilal Parasmal Jain, the original accused, challenging his conviction under Section 7...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in NDPS Case Due to Non-Compliance with Section 50. Failure to Inform Accused of Right to be Searched Before Gazetted Officer or Magistrate Renders Conviction Unsustainable.

The appellant, Gangaram s/o Jairam Chaudekar, was convicted under Section 20(b)(i) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (NDPS A...