Search Results for "Saurashtra Rules"

116 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 116 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

"Supreme Court of India Resolves Complexities in Taxation of Mineral Rights" "Judgment Clarifies Legislative Powers and the Nature of Royalty in Mining Sector"

The Supreme Court of India addressed a significant dispute regarding the distribution of legislative powers between the Union and the States, specific...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Allows Petition Challenging Cancellation of Revenue Entry — Petitioner's Name to Continue in Revenue Records. Revisional Authority Failed to Consider Bona Fide Purchase Under Gujarat Land Revenue Code, 1879.

The petitioner, Sintex Power Limited, purchased agricultural land in Village Lunsapur, Taluka Jafrabad, District Amreli, Gujarat, comprising Survey No...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds High Court Decision Quashing Commissioner’s Revisional Order in Land Revenue Matter; Commissioner’s Delayed Revisional Exercise Under Section 211 Bombay Land Revenue Code, 1879 Deemed Unreasonable

The case arose from an application by Patel Raghav Natha, an occupant of agricultural land in Rajkot, seeking permission under section 65 of the Bomba...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Allows Petition of Adhyapak Sahayak Against University's Refusal to Approve Appointment. University's order quashed for being arbitrary and contrary to UGC Regulations, 2018 and its own ordinances.

The petitioner, Smita Hiren Gadhvi, was appointed as Adhyapak Sahayak by respondent No.3-institution. The appointment was forwarded to respondent No.2...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Retrospective Amendment to Sales Tax Incentive Scheme. Retrospective Operation of Section 41B of Bombay Sales Tax Act and Rule 31AA Upheld as Valid and Not Violative of Vested Rights.

The petitioners, M/s. Prasad Power Control Pvt. Limited and its director, challenged the constitutional validity of Section 41B of the Bombay Sales Ta...