CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4905 OF 2022
1 Jan 1970The present civil appeal arose under Section 15Z of the Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992 challenging the order dated 19.04.2022 passed...
Search Results for "SEBI disclosure"
90 result(s) found
Found 90 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging SEBI Consent Guidelines Requiring Pendency of Proceedings. Requirement of pendency of court proceedings or adjudication for consent applications under SEBI Guidelines is not arbitrary and does not violate Article 14 of the Constitution.
17 Jan 2012The petitioners, Shilpa Stock Broker Pvt. Ltd. and another, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging the validity of cl...
- 124
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Dismisses SEBI's Appeal in Securities Market Violation Case Due to Absence of Question of Law. Tribunal's Factual Findings on Advertisements, Manipulation, and Natural Justice Upheld, with Jurisdiction Under Section 15Z of SEBI Act, 1992 Confined to Legal Issues.
25 Mar 2022The dispute arose from a statutory appeal under Section 15Z of the Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992, filed by SEBI against the Securit...
- 364
High Court
Bombay High Court Reviews Special Court Order Refusing Compounding of SEBI Offences Under Section 24A. Special Court's Reliance on SEBI's Refusal without Independent Assessment Misdirected Jurisdiction, Citing Prakash Gupta Precedent.
6 Sep 2021The Bombay High Court considered a criminal application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 challenging an order of the SEBI Spe...
- 15
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging SEBI's Rejection of Condonation of Delay in Settlement Applications. SEBI's refusal to condone delay in filing settlement applications under SEBI (Settlement of Administrative and Civil Proceedings) Regulations, 2014 upheld as petitioner failed to show sufficient cause.
4 Sep 2019The petitioner, New Delhi Television Limited (NDTL), a company engaged in operating news channels, challenged orders dated 23.8.2017 and 31.8.2017 pas...
- 80
High Court
Bombay High Court Examines Challenge to SEBI Special Court's Rejection of Compounding Application Under Section 24A of SEBI Act. Writ Petition Filed Against Order Denying Compounding of Offence Under Section 24(2) for Non-Payment of Penalty Without SEBI Consent.
30 Oct 2018The case involved a criminal writ petition filed by N.H. Securities Ltd. and its directors seeking to quash an order of the SEBI Special Court that ha...
- 98
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Upholds SEBI's Order Against Kotak Mutual Fund for Violating SEBI Circular on Side Pocketing of Debt Securities. The Court held that the creation of segregated portfolios without complying with the mandatory conditions of the SEBI circular dated 28th December 2018 was impermissible, and the fund managers and trustees were liable for the resulting losses.
13 Jul 2026The case involves appeals by Kotak Mahindra Asset Management Company Limited (Kotak AMC), Kotak Mahindra Trustee Company Limited, and several senior e...
- 160
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Compounding Application in SEBI Act Case, Overturning Lower Court Decisions on Consent Requirement. Court Holds That Section 24A of Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992 Does Not Mandate SEBI's Consent for Compounding, and Compounding Can Be Considered at Advanced Trial Stages Based on Factual Assessment.
23 Jul 2021The dispute arose from a criminal prosecution under Section 24(1) of the Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992, against the appellant, a di...
- 356
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to SEBI Show Cause Notice in Reorganisation Case — Delay, Review, and Natural Justice Grounds Rejected. Court holds that show cause notice issued after 10 years is not per se barred by laches where allegations involve complex corporate restructuring and SEBI's earlier closure of complaints does not preclude fresh proceedings.
9 Dec 2024The petitioners, including Nalwa Sons Investments Ltd and several individuals, challenged a show cause notice dated 20 August 2024 issued by the Secur...
- 493
High Court
Bombay High Court Delivers Oral Judgment on Petitions Challenging SEBI's Show Cause Notices to Auditors of Satyam Computers. Question of SEBI's Jurisdiction under Sections 11, 11B, and 11(4) of SEBI Act Raised in Wake of Satyam Fraud Disclosure.
13 Aug 2010The matter arose from writ petitions filed by Price Waterhouse & Co. and other chartered accountant firms along with individual partners challenging t...
- 60
