Search Results for "SEBI Investigation"

62 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 62 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Directs SEBI to Liquidate Attached Assets and Refund Investors in Collective Investment Scheme Case — Court Emphasizes Need for Time-Bound Disposal and Coordination Between Authorities

The petitioners, who are husband, wife, and their son, were founder-directors of Sai Prasad Properties Ltd and other companies in the Sai Group. They ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses SEBI's Appeal in Securities Market Violation Case Due to Absence of Question of Law. Tribunal's Factual Findings on Advertisements, Manipulation, and Natural Justice Upheld, with Jurisdiction Under Section 15Z of SEBI Act, 1992 Confined to Legal Issues.

The dispute arose from a statutory appeal under Section 15Z of the Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992, filed by SEBI against the Securit...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appellant in SEBI PFUTP Regulations Case Due to Non-Disclosure of Investigation Report. The Court Held That the Investigation Report Under Regulation 9 Must Be Disclosed to Ensure a Fair Hearing Under Principles of Natural Justice, as It Forms the Basis for the Show Cause Notice.

The dispute arose from a show cause notice issued by SEBI to the appellant, alleging violations of the SEBI (Prohibition of Fraudulent and Unfair Trad...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds SAT Order Setting Aside SEBI Ex-Parte Interim Order in Insider Trading Case Due to Lack of Urgency. Tribunal's observation on SEBI's power to order pre-adjudication disgorgement held not to be a precedent.

The Supreme Court disposed of two statutory appeals filed by the Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) under Section 15Z of the SEBI Act, 1992...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Holds Section 15J Factors Illustrative in SEBI Penalty Adjudication. Adjudicating Officer Retains Discretion to Consider Mitigating Circumstances Beyond Stipulated Factors Under SEBI Act.

The Supreme Court of India adjudicated a reference arising from multiple civil appeals concerning the interpretation of Section 15J of the Securities ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Arbitral Award in Broker-Client Dispute. Court Upholds Award Directing Payment of Rs.1,58,39,459.87 but Refuses Interest and Costs Under Section 34 of Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996.

The appellant, Harinarayan Bajaj, entered into various share transactions on the Bombay Stock Exchange (BSE) through the respondent, Madhukar Sheth, w...