Search Results for "Rule 986"

98 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 98 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Amendment to Plaint in Property Dispute Due to Subsequent Dispossession. Amendment Based on Events After Issues Framed Is Permissible Under Order 6 Rule 17 CPC Despite Delay.

The petitioner, Dela Gurudal Vanjari, filed a suit in 2005 seeking a declaration that a mutation entry was illegal and for an injunction against the r...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Against Public Servant for Lack of Sanction Under Section 197 CrPC. Applicant, a Deputy Registrar, was prosecuted for alleged offences under Sections 406, 420, 467, 468, 471 IPC without prior sanction as required by Section 197 CrPC.

The applicant, Yogiraj Vasantrao Surve, was working as District Deputy Registrar, Cooperative Societies, Akola, and previously as Deputy Registrar, Co...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeals in Property Declaration Suits — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With. Appellants failed to prove title and possession; no substantial question of law arose under Section 100 CPC.

The judgment pertains to two Regular First Appeals (R.F.A.No.784/2013 and R.F.A.No.785/2013) filed under Section 96 read with Order 41 Rule 1 of the C...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Probate Petition for Will Executed by NRI in Ecuador. Will executed abroad by Non-Resident Indian held valid under Section 63 of Indian Succession Act, 1925, and probate granted to executor in Mumbai.

The petitioner, Sarwan Kumar Jhabarmal Choudhary, filed a testamentary petition (L) No. 6300 of 2024 in the Bombay High Court seeking probate of the L...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Rejection of IA for Framing Additional Issues in Injunction Suit. Order 14 Rule 1 and 5 CPC does not mandate framing of issues on every factual controversy; only on material propositions of fact or law.

The petitioner, plaintiff in O.S. No.374/2016, filed a suit for permanent injunction against the respondents to restrain them from interfering with hi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Hears Challenge to Denial of Exemption for Transitional Product Specific Safeguard Duty under Section 8C of Customs Tariff Act, 1975. Petitioner Asserts Notification No.96/2009-Cus. Intended to Exempt All Safeguard Duties and Phrase 'under section 8B' is Discriminatory.

The petitioner, a public limited company manufacturing pneumatic tyres, regularly imported Carbon Black from the People’s Republic of China. Carbon ...