High Court of Karnataka Disposes of Multiple Motor Accident Claims Appeals Under Section 173(1) of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. Appeals Filed by Insurance Companies and Claimants Challenging Awards of Compensation by MACTs.
22 Dec 2020...
Search Results for "Rule 77(1) proviso"
69 result(s) found
Found 69 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Upholds Constitutional Validity of Section 234E of Income Tax Act, 1961 — Levy of Fee for Late Filing of TDS Returns is Valid. The Court held that the fee under Section 234E is compensatory in nature and not a penalty, and does not violate Article 14 of the Constitution.
9 Feb 2015The petitioners, a practising Chartered Accountant and others, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the co...
- 112
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Appeals in Arbitration Appointment Dispute — Pre-Amendment Act Applies; No Claim Certificate Does Not Bar Arbitration; Mutually Agreed Procedure Must Be Respected
29 Mar 2019The Supreme Court heard a batch of appeals arising from orders of the Rajasthan High Court appointing independent arbitrators under Section 11(6) of t...
- 139
High Court
- 18
High Court
Gujarat High Court Quashes Trial Court Order Allowing Late Filing of Written Statement in Civil Suit — Violation of Order 8 Rule 1 CPC. Court holds that discretion to condone delay in filing written statement must be supported by sufficient cause and cannot be exercised mechanically.
23 Mar 2026The petitioners, original plaintiffs in Regular Civil Suit No. 294/2010 pending before the Court of Additional Senior Civil Judge (Rural), Ahmedabad, ...
- 62
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Partition Suit Due to Disputed Consent Terms. Consent Decree Set Aside as Court Failed to Verify Genuineness of Compromise Under Order XXIII Rule 3 CPC.
20 Sep 2013The appeal arises from a judgment of a learned Single Judge of the Bombay High Court dated 28 September 2012, which made absolute a motion for recordi...
- 120
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Sets Aside High Court Orders in SARFAESI Act Recovery Case, Reiterates Limited Scope of Article 226 in Private Financial Disputes. The Court held that the High Court cannot entertain writ petitions challenging SARFAESI Act actions when an alternative remedy under Section 17 of the Act is available, and the interim arrangement by the Supreme Court did not confer jurisdiction to decide merits after DRT became functional.
17 Apr 2023The case involves appeals by a lender bank against orders of the Kerala High Court that entertained writ petitions filed by borrowers (respondents) ch...
- 343
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Local Body Tax Classification. Classification of dealers based on turnover for LBT exemption is valid under Article 14 as it has a rational nexus with the object of the Maharashtra Municipal Corporation Act, 1949.
8 Jan 2016The petitioners, M/s. Nagpur Distillers Private Limited and M/s. Vidarbha Distillers, are dealers within the meaning of Section 2(16A) of the Maharash...
- 118
High Court
High Court of Judicature at Bombay Dismisses Objections to Maintainability and Limitation in Suit for Recovery of Trust Property. Civil Court Jurisdiction Not Ousted Under Maharashtra Public Trusts Act, 1950; Suit for Recovery of Shares by Public Charitable Trusts Not Barred by Limitation.
19 Sep 2016The case concerned a notice of motion taken out by two public charitable trusts, the J.V. Gokal Charity Trust and Shree Krishna Foundation, against Co...
- 24
