Search Results for "Rule 33A"

108 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 108 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Section 482 Petition Challenging Issuance of Process in Legal Metrology Case Despite Alternate Remedy. Once a petition is admitted and heard on merits, it cannot be dismissed as not maintainable merely because a revision could have been filed.

The applicant, Volvo India Private Limited, filed a criminal application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code before the Bombay High Court...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Considers Challenge to Section 36(4) of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Restricting Legal Representation Without Consent. Employer Seeks to Quash Labour Court Order Barring Engagement of Advocate in Industrial Dispute Reference.

The petitioner, a company engaged in manufacturing, dismissed the respondent workman for misconduct after due process in August 2015. The workman rais...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Applicability of Biological Diversity Rules to Indian Entities. Rule 17 of Biological Diversity Rules, 2004 and Benefit Sharing Regulations Apply to All Entities, Not Just Foreign Entities.

The petitioners, comprising an association of Ayurvedic drug manufacturers and individual companies, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Co...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Deficit Stamp Duty Demand in Development Agreement Case — Delay and Lack of Speaking Order Render Proceedings Invalid. Section 33A of Maharashtra Stamp Act, 1958 invoked after 10 years without proper application of mind; order set aside.

The Petitioner, Axayraj Buildwell Pvt. Ltd. (now Moongipa Realty Pvt. Ltd.), a developer, entered into a Development Agreement with D.N. Nagar Shree A...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses RTI Activist's Petition Seeking Income Tax Returns of Public Figure. Holds That Personal Information of Third Party Cannot Be Disclosed Unless Larger Public Interest Is Established Under Section 8(1)(j) of RTI Act, 2005.

The petitioner, Shailesh Gandhi, an RTI activist and former Central Information Commissioner, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitut...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Interim Application in Waqf Property Dispute — Status Quo Maintained Pending Final Hearing. Court holds that interim protection is necessary to preserve the subject matter of the suit and prevent irreparable loss to the applicants.

The present matter is an interim application filed in a suit pending before the Bombay High Court. The applicants, Masjid and Madarsa Gausiya (a regis...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Revision in Trust Property Dispute — Civil Court Jurisdiction Not Ousted by Bombay Public Trusts Act. Suit for Declaration of Ownership and Injunction Maintainable as Dispute Involves Title, Not Just Trust Administration.

The petitioners (original defendants) filed a civil revision application challenging the order of the District Court which set aside the trial court's...