Search Results for "Rule 272"

221 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 221 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Assessee's Appeal in Income Tax Case on Dividend Distribution Tax Rate. DDT under Section 115-O is a tax on the company, not on shareholders, and the India-UK DTAA does not provide a lower rate for DDT.

The Bombay High Court dismissed a batch of seven appeals filed by Foseco India Ltd. under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, challenging a comm...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Refers Challenge to Abrogation of Article 370 to Larger Bench Due to Conflicting Precedents. The Court finds conflicting views on whether Article 370 is temporary or permanent, requiring resolution by a larger Bench.

This order by the Supreme Court of India deals with a preliminary issue in a batch of petitions challenging the constitutional validity of two Constit...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Quashing of Attempt to Murder Case on Compromise. Section 482 CrPC Invoked to Quash FIR Under Section 307 IPC as Complainant Settled Dispute and Injuries Were Simple.

The applicant, Sayyed Tareque Ali, filed a criminal application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC) seeking quashing of R...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal by Telecommunication Company Against Injunction Restraining Tower Construction. Court Upholds Trial Court's Order Based on Balance of Convenience and Prima Facie Case of Nuisance to Residents.

The appellant, Reliance Infocom Ltd., a company incorporated under the Indian Companies Act, 1956, engaged in telecommunications, filed a suit for per...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR Against Directors in Pan Masala Ban Case — No Offence Under Section 328 IPC. Pan Masala Not a 'Poison' or 'Noxious Substance' Despite Ban Under Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954.

The petitioners, Rajiv Kumar Gupta, Piyush Kumar Gupta, and Satyanarayan Gupta, were directors of Dharampal Satyapal Limited, a company manufacturing ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeals in Property Partition Suit — Upholds Trial Court's Refusal to Reject Plaint Under Order VII Rule 11 CPC. Plaint Discloses Cause of Action and Is Not Barred by Limitation or Res Judicata.

The case involves three appeals filed by the defendants (Smt. Malti Kapadia, Hemant Kapadia, and Vijaysingh Kapadia) against an order of the City Civi...