Search Results for "Rule 102(2)"

74 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 74 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Food Adulteration Case Due to Non-Compliance with Mandatory Sampling Procedure. Failure to Follow Section 11 of Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 and Rule 14 of PFA Rules Renders Conviction Unsustainable.

The petitioner, Sri. Syed Ahammed, was the accused in Criminal Case No.1022/2008 before the Civil Judge and JMFC, Sakaleshpura, for an offence under t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Appointment of Receiver in Suit for Specific Performance — Appellant's Alienation of Property During Pendency of Suit Held Contumacious. Doctrine of Lis Pendens Under Section 52 of Transfer of Property Act, 1882 Applied to Protect Plaintiffs' Rights.

The appeal arose from an order appointing a Receiver over a property in a suit for specific performance and permanent injunction. The plaintiffs (resp...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Considers Arbitration Petition No. 1070 of 2011 Under Section 45 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The Petition Seeks Reference to ICC Arbitration in Dubai Pursuant to a Share Purchase Agreement; the Judgment Text is Incomplete.

The matter arose from a Share Purchase Agreement (SPA) dated 10 December 2004 between Welspun Trading Limited (transferor) and Eupec PipeCoatings GmbH...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Ineligibility for Judicial Appointment Due to Absence in Examination, Not Failure. Distinction between 'failure' and 'absence' in examination eligibility criteria for appointment as Civil Judge, Junior Division and Judicial Magistrate, First Class.

The petitioner, Harsha d/o Bhikaji Gadekar, applied for the post of Civil Judge, Junior Division and Judicial Magistrate, First Class (CJJD and JMFC) ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Transfer Petition in Cheque Dishonour Case, Upholds Jurisdiction Under Section 142 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881

Bank’s Right to Choose Jurisdiction for Cheque Dishonour Cases Upheld – Transfer Denied Under Section 406 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition by Cooperative Bank's Recovery Officer Against Auction Sale of Property. Sale by cooperative bank under MCS Act is not a sale under Transfer of Property Act, and recovery officer is not a court or tribunal under Limitation Act.

The petitioner, the Special Recovery Officer/Sales Officer of Dr. Annasaheb Chougule Urban Cooperative Bank Ltd., filed a writ petition under Article ...