Search Results for "Review Rules 2011"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "Review Rules 2011"

1281 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1281 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Madras Adjudicates Writ Petitions Challenging Central Administrative Tribunal Order Regarding Promotion to Custom Appraiser in Customs Department. Petitioners sought quashing of the Tribunal's order dated 03.09.2010 in O.A.No.12 of 2010 and direction to grant them notional promotion as Inspector (Examiner) from 20.10.2003, and to interdict promotion of juniors to Custom Appraiser without first considering petitioners.

19 Feb 2025

...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Validity of Maharashtra Revenue Services (Recruitment) Rules, 2020 and Directs Finalization of Seniority Lists for Deputy Collectors — Seniority to be Determined by Date of Continuous Officiation, Not by Date of Regular Promotion.

8 Aug 2024

The judgment pertains to a batch of writ petitions filed by Deputy Collectors and the State of Maharashtra concerning the determination of seniority o...

High Court

Court Upholds Recruitment Rules of 2015, Dismisses Petition Challenging RFO Seniority List. Petitioners' reliance on superseded 1998 Rules and failure to include all affected parties lead to dismissal; seniority list validated under 2015 Rules.

2 Aug 2024

The petitioners challenged the seniority list based on the Recruitment Rules of 1998, arguing against the application of the Recruitment Rules of 2015...

High Court

Bombay High Court Holds Entire Rule 15 of MEPS Rules Applies to Probationary Employees Under Section 5(3) of MEPS Act — Non-Compliance of Sub-Rules (3) and (5) Does Not Ipso Facto Vitiate Termination if Sub-Rule (6) Is Satisfied. The court clarified that only sub-rule (6) of Rule 15 is relevant for termination during probation, and failure to comply with sub-rules (3) and (5) does not automatically invalidate termination if the Management has objectively assessed the employee's performance.

30 May 2023

This judgment arises from a reference made by a learned Single Judge to a Larger Bench of the Bombay High Court at Nagpur, concerning the interpretati...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Reopens Death Penalty Review Petition for Open Court Hearing Following Constitutional Bench Precedent. The Court recalled an earlier dismissal by circulation and ordered an open court hearing based on Mohd. Arif v Registrar, Supreme Court of India, 2014 (9) SCC 737, which mandates oral hearings in death penalty review cases due to the irreversible nature of the penalty.

21 Mar 2023

The judgment involves a convict on death row who filed a review petition seeking a fresh look at his conviction for murder and death sentence, based o...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging DRAT Order Rejecting Condonation of 856-Day Delay in Filing Appeal Against Decree on Admission. Petitioner's Withdrawal of Timely Appeal and Subsequent Delay Not Justified as Sufficient Cause Under Section 5 of Limitation Act, 1963.

17 Jan 2023

The Petitioner, MSTC Limited, a Government of India Enterprise, filed a Writ Petition challenging the order dated 9 November 2022 passed by the Debt R...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeals in Service Law Dispute Over Recruitment Rules Implementation. The High Court's review of its 2011 judgment was set aside as it misread the precedent in BSNL vs. Mishri Lal & Ors. and erroneously found the Assistant Director (Official Language) Recruitment Rules, 2002, were not implemented, despite evidence of promotions and pay revisions under those rules.

21 Sep 2021

The dispute involved employees of Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited (BSNL) who were appointed as Hindi Translators and Telecom Office Assistants in 1988-19...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Allows Writ Petition Challenging DRT Order on Condonation of Delay in Review Application — Limitation for Review Under Section 17 of Recovery of Debts and Bankruptcy Act, 1993 Governed by Section 5 of Limitation Act, 1963.

3 May 2019

The Petitioner, MSTC Limited, a Government of India Enterprise, filed a Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging an or...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Refers to Larger Bench Question of Maintainability of Review Petition After Dismissal of SLP in Limine. The issue is whether a review petition is maintainable before the High Court after the Supreme Court dismisses a special leave petition without granting leave, particularly when the dismissal is in limine and by a non-speaking order.

1 Mar 2019

The case arises from a money suit filed by the respondent (a cooperative sugar factory under liquidation) against the appellant (Khoday Distilleries L...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes PF Orders for Violation of Natural Justice in M/s Ashmit Motors Case. Orders under Sections 7A and 7B of Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 set aside as passed without hearing the establishment.

19 Sep 2016

The petitioner, M/s Ashmit Motors Private Limited, a car dealership, challenged two orders passed by the Assistant Provident Fund Commissioner: (1) an...

1 2 3 4

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)