Search Results for "Retired employees"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "Retired employees"

1480 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1480 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Pro-rata Pension for Voluntary Retiree Under Bank's Voluntary Retirement Scheme. Employee with 11 years of service and over 40 years of age held eligible for pension under Regulation 14 of Central Bank of India (Employees') Pension Regulations, 1995.

31 Jul 2019

The case involves an appeal by the Central Bank of India against a judgment of the Rajasthan High Court which allowed the writ petition of the respond...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Retired Employees' Writ Petitions for Provident Fund Pensionary Benefits — EPF Scheme 1995. Employer's Default in Contribution Does Not Bar Employees' Entitlement to Pension Under Employees' Pension Scheme, 1995.

13 Jun 2019

The judgment pertains to a batch of writ petitions filed by retired employees seeking pensionary benefits under the Employees' Pension Scheme, 1995. T...

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Assesses Whether Rule 48-B of Central Civil Services Pension Rules, 1972 Applies Retrospectively to Employees Who Voluntarily Retired Before Its Enactment. The Court Relied on D.S. Nakara to Emphasize that Pension is a Vested Right and Not a Bounty, a Principle Central to Determining the Rule's Temporal Scope.

29 Mar 2005

The matter arose from a writ petition filed before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay by the Union of India and the Accountant General (A&E)-I, Ma...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Union of India's Writ Petitions Challenging CAT's Decision on Retirement Gratuity Effective Date. Employees Who Retired on 31.03.1995 Are Not Entitled to Revised Gratuity Scheme Effective from 01.04.1995 as Per O.M. Dated 14.07.1995.

29 Aug 2012

The case involved two writ petitions filed by the Union of India against orders of the Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT), Mumbai Bench, which had ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Retired Employees' Pension Claim Despite Non-Deposit of Management Contribution — Government Resolution Clause 3 Covers Employees Who Retired Before Scheme Introduction. Prior Court Directions in Writ Petition No. 1530 of 2010 Must Be Complied With; Rejection Based on Non-Deposit of Contribution Is Invalid.

30 Jun 2026

The petitioners, three retired employees of the State of Maharashtra, challenged a communication dated 31st October 2023 from Respondent No. 3 rejecti...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Pension to Ayurvedic College Teachers Who Voluntarily Retired or Resigned After Qualifying Service. Employees of aided Ayurvedic, Unani, and Homeopathic educational institutions are entitled to pension and gratuity benefits under the Maharashtra Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1982, read with the Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Service) Regulation Act, 1977.

28 Feb 2019

The petitioners, five retired doctors and one other employee, were employed at various aided Ayurvedic, Unani, and Homeopathic educational institution...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Pension Claims of Former U.P. Roadways Employees Absorbed in Corporation - Employees Not Holding Pensionable Posts Under U.P. Civil Service Regulations. The Court held that employees of a temporary department of the State Government, absorbed in a statutory corporation, are not entitled to pension as they did not hold pensionable posts under the U.P. Civil Service Regulations.

26 Jul 2024

The Supreme Court dismissed a batch of civil appeals filed by former employees of Uttar Pradesh Roadways (a temporary department of the State Governme...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition of Retired Bank Employee Challenging Discontinuation of Pension in Lieu of Gratuity — Pension Cannot Be Unilaterally Stopped Without Amendment to Service Regulations. The court held that pensionary benefits constitute a package and the bank could not discontinue the petitioner's pension without amending the service regulations, as the petitioner had a vested right to pension under the Pension Rules.

19 Jan 2012

The petitioner, Shapoor M. Mehta, an 87-year-old senior citizen, retired from Allahabad Bank on 30 May 1986 after 39 years of service as a Special Ass...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Retired Employee's Petition for Terminal Dues Despite Pending Departmental Enquiry Initiated After Retirement. Employer's failure to conclude enquiry within reasonable time disentitles it from withholding retirement benefits under Maharashtra Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1982.

12 Jan 2017

The petitioner, Dattatreya Mahadev Pusalekar, retired as Assistant Manager from the Maharashtra Small Scale Industries Development Corporation on 30-1...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions of Former Bank Employees Seeking Pension After Resignation — Resignation Not Equivalent to Voluntary Retirement Under Bank of India (Employees) Pension Regulations, 1995. The court held that resignation is a voluntary act of giving up employment and does not entitle an employee to pension under Regulation 22 of the Bank of India (Employees) Pension Regulations, 1995, as the petitioners had not completed 20 years of qualifying service and their resignations were not treated as voluntary retirement.

21 Jul 2017

The petitioners were former employees of the Bank of India who had resigned from service. They filed writ petitions seeking a direction to the bank to...

1 2 3 4

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)