Search Results for "Restricted Goods"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "Restricted Goods"

645 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 645 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows State's Appeals in VAT Input Tax Credit Dispute — Rule 21(8) of Punjab VAT Rules Valid Despite Absence of Specific Enabling Provision in Parent Act at Time of Introduction. Input Tax Credit is a Facility, Not a Vested Right; State Can Restrict ITC on Stock-in-Trade to Reduced Tax Rate.

4 Mar 2025

The Supreme Court considered appeals by the State of Punjab against a High Court judgment that had struck down Rule 21(8) of the Punjab Value Added Ta...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petition Quashing Seizure Order Under Section 67(2) of CGST Act Due to Non-Compliance with Mandatory Requirements. Seizure of cash from residential premises of an employee without proper authorization and recording of reasons held invalid, cash ordered to be returned.

20 Feb 2024

The petitioners, B. Kusuma Poonacha and J K Manjunath, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India before the High C...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petitions Challenging Customs Duty Demand on Jewellery Exports from SEZ — Held that goods manufactured in SEZ and exported are not liable to customs duty under Section 2(23) of the Customs Act, 1962 read with SEZ Act, 2005. The court ruled that the SEZ Act, 2005 is a complete code and overrides the Customs Act, and the demand of duty was contrary to the scheme of the SEZ Act.

19 Nov 2022

The petitioners, M/s. Renaissance Global Limited and M/s. Gold Star Jewellery Designs Pvt. Ltd., are companies engaged in the manufacture and export o...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Plaintiff's Motion in Trade Mark Infringement Case Involving Use of Registered Mark as Corporate Name for Dissimilar Goods. The Full Bench overruled Raymond Ltd v Raymond Pharmaceuticals Pvt Ltd and held that Section 29(5) of the Trade Marks Act, 1999 provides a separate cause of action for infringement when a registered trade mark is used as a corporate or trading name, even for dissimilar goods.

1 Mar 2017

The case involves a Notice of Motion in a suit filed by CIPLA Limited against M/s. CIPLA Industries Private Limited and Vishal Khanna for alleged infr...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Tax on Hire Purchase Components Under Bombay Sales Tax Act — Option Money, Insurance, and Hire Premium Included in Sale Price. Hire Purchase Transaction Constitutes a Sale and Resale Deduction Under Section 8 Not Available.

30 Jan 2015

The case involves two sales tax references under the Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959, arising from the Maharashtra Sales Tax Tribunal. The applicant, M/s. ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Arbitral Award in Steel Coils Supply Dispute — Non-Conforming Goods Justify Rejection and Damages. The court upheld the arbitral award granting damages for breach of contract where goods did not meet specifications under the contract for sale of goods.

20 Aug 2014

The petitioner, JSW Steel Ltd., challenged an arbitral award dated 28th May 2013 under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The d...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Trade Circulars Restricting CST Exemption to Registered Dealers. State Government Cannot Grant Exemption for Inter-State Sales to Unregistered Dealers Under Section 8(5) of Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 After 2002 Amendment.

30 Aug 2012

The petitioners, Prism Cement Limited and its shareholder/director, filed a writ petition challenging three trade circulars issued by the Commissioner...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Constitutional Validity of Maharashtra Tax on Lotteries, Betting and Gambling Act, 2006 — Levy on Entry Fee for Games of Skill and Chance Upheld. The Court held that the tax on entry fee for games like poker, rummy, and bridge is a valid compensatory tax under Entry 62 of List II of the Seventh Schedule to the Constitution of India.

10 Apr 2012

The judgment concerns a batch of writ petitions challenging the constitutional validity of the Maharashtra Tax on Lotteries, Betting and Gambling Act,...

High Court

Bombay High Court Rules Against Export Tax Exemption for Helium Gas Supplied to ONGC at Mumbai High. Sales to ONGC at Mumbai High Not Exports Under Section 5(1) Central Sales Tax Act as Mumbai High Is Not a Foreign Destination.

9 Jan 2012

The case involves a sales tax reference under Section 61(4) of the Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959, arising from a decision of the Maharashtra Sales Tax Tr...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Tribunal in Sales Tax Reference — Activity on Customer's Goods Not Manufacture. Processing of customer-supplied goods constitutes works contract, not manufacture, under Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959, and purchase tax under Section 13AA is not leviable.

30 Apr 2010

The case involves a reference under Section 61(1) of the Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959, at the instance of the Revenue, against the judgment of the Mahar...

1 2 3 4

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)