Search Results for "Reappreciation of Evidence"

Trending :

Search Results for "Reappreciation of Evidence"

79 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 79 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Commercial Dispute — No Ground for Interference Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Court Held That the Arbitral Tribunal's Findings on Factual Issues and Interpretation of Contractual Terms Are Not Open to Reappreciation in a Section 34 Petition.

2 Apr 2026

The present petition was filed under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an arbitral award dated 30/09/2024 passed b...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Partition Suit — Reverses Lower Appellate Court's Erroneous Reversal of Trial Court's Decree. The Court Held That the First Appellate Court Must Reappreciate Evidence Independently and That a Co-Owner Cannot Claim Adverse Possession Without Ouster.

11 Nov 2025

The present second appeal arises from a partition suit filed by the original plaintiff (since deceased, represented by legal heirs) against the appell...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Partially Allows Appeal in Arbitration Dispute Over Construction of World's Highest Railway Bridge. Division Bench's Interference with Concurrent Findings of Arbitral Tribunal and Single Judge Set Aside for Exceeding Section 37 Scope.

18 Jul 2023

The appeal arises from a dispute between Konkan Railway Corporation Limited (appellant) and Chenab Bridge Project Undertaking (respondent) concerning ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Arbitration Matter, Restores Arbitral Award. Court holds that Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, does not permit reappreciation of evidence or substitution of the arbitrator's view, and the Single Judge exceeded jurisdiction by setting aside the award on merits.

14 Jun 2016

The case involves an appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, against a judgment dated 29th July 2015, whereby the learn...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Under Section 37 of Arbitration Act, Restores Arbitral Award for Breach of Cotton Supply Contract. Court Holds That District Court Exceeded Its Jurisdiction Under Section 34 by Reappreciating Evidence and Interfering with Arbitrator's Findings on Factual Issues.

20 Apr 2016

The appellant, M/s. Gill & Company Pvt. Ltd., filed an appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging the judgment...

High Court

Bombay High Court Condoned Delay in Filing Review Application and Dismissed Review as Not Maintainable Against Order Directing Reinstatement of Employee Whose Caste Claim Was Invalidated. The Court Held That Review Lies Only for Error Apparent on Record, Not for Reappreciation of Evidence.

11 Aug 2015

The judgment pertains to Civil Application No. 1168 of 2015 filed by the Chief Executive Officer, Zilla Parishad, Gondia and the Medical Officer, Prim...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Arbitral Awards in Software Development Disputes — No Patent Illegality or Perversity Found. Court upholds awards under Section 34 of Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996, finding no grounds for interference with arbitrator's findings on breach of contract and quantum.

16 Jan 2015

The judgment concerns three arbitration petitions filed under Section 34 of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging separate arbitral aw...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition by Municipal Council Against Labour Court Order of Reinstatement with Back Wages. Labour Court Exceeded Jurisdiction by Reappreciating Evidence in Domestic Inquiry Under Section 30 of MRTU & PULP Act, 1971.

28 Nov 2013

The petitioner, Sangamner Nagar Parishad, challenged the judgment and order of the Labour Court, Ahmednagar, dated 30/04/2013, in Complaint (ULP) No. ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal by Indian Oil Corporation in Dealership Dispute — Restores Arbitral Award. The court held that the Single Judge exceeded jurisdiction under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 by reappreciating evidence and substituting his own view for the arbitrator's plausible findings.

10 Oct 2013

The appeal arose from a judgment of a learned Single Judge of the Bombay High Court dated 25 March 2013, which set aside an arbitral award under Secti...

High Court

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Absence of Public Witness. Conviction under Section 302 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

18 Oct 2006

The appellant, Sanjay Madhukar Kharade, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Solapur, under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, for...

1 2 3 4

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)