Search Results for "Railway Employee"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "Railway Employee"

527 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 527 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses State's Appeal in Disciplinary Proceedings for Violation of Natural Justice and Procedural Rules. The Court upheld the Tribunal's order setting aside punishment due to non-compliance with U.P. Government Servants (Discipline and Appeal) Rules, 1999, including failure to examine witnesses, supply documents, and seek extension of court-stipulated time.

23 Apr 2025

The appeal arose from a challenge by the State of Uttar Pradesh against a High Court order dismissing its writ petition, which had sought to overturn ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Ex-Promoters' Gratuity Claims, Holds Directors in Control Not 'Employees' Under Payment of Gratuity Act. Founders who were in absolute control of company affairs cannot claim gratuity as employees despite drawing salary, as they fall outside the definition of 'employee' under Section 2(e) of the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972.

20 Aug 2024

The petitioners, Anil Govind Ganu and Ashwini Anil Ganu, were the founders and directors of Innovative Technomics Pvt. Ltd. They claimed gratuity for ...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Upholds Railway Compensation for Passenger Injured While Deboarding Wrong Train — Negligence Not a Bar Under Section 124A of Railways Act, 1989. The court held that an accidental fall from a train while attempting to deboard a moving train constitutes an 'untoward incident' under Section 124A of the Railways Act, 1989, and the Railway is strictly liable for compensation regardless of the passenger's negligence.

11 Nov 2022

The case involves two appeals filed by the Union of India, through the General Manager, Central Railway, challenging the decision of the Railway Claim...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal of Employer Seeking Exclusion of Retired Railway Employees from EPF Coverage. Retired Employees Who Withdrew Full GPF Accumulations Are Not 'Excluded Employees' Under Paragraph 2(f) of the Employees' Provident Funds Scheme, 1952, as the Term 'Fund' Refers Only to the EPF Fund Established Under the Act.

26 Mar 2019

The case involves an appeal by Modern Transportation Consultation Services Pvt. Ltd. and its director against the judgment of the Division Bench of th...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Railway Accident Compensation Case — Deemed Deceased a Bonafide Passenger Based on Circumstantial Evidence. Section 124A of the Railways Act, 1989 does not require strict proof of ticket purchase; presumption of bonafide passenger arises from credible oral testimony and surrounding circumstances.

20 Jun 2017

The appellants, parents and minor brother of deceased Ravi, filed a claim petition before the Railway Claims Tribunal, Nagpur, seeking compensation of...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Employer's Appeal in Part, Upholds Reinstatement but Reduces Back Wages to 25% in School Tribunal Termination Case. Employee's Cross-Appeal for Full Back Wages Dismissed as Termination Found Justified on Merits but Procedural Defect in Enquiry.

11 Jan 2016

The case involves two Letters Patent Appeals arising from a dispute between an employer trust and an employee regarding termination of service. The em...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Discharge of Accused in Railway Property Case Due to Lack of Evidence of Knowledge. Possession of railway property without proof of knowledge or reason to believe it is railway property does not attract Section 3(a) of Railway Property (Unlawful Possession) Act, 1966.

22 Nov 2013

The petitioner, Bhagwat Rajaram Patil, was the owner of a rolling mill at Manyarkheda, Jalgaon. On 18 July 1999, the Railway Protection Force (RPF) co...

High Court

Bombay High Court Partially Allows Employee's Petition and Dismisses Employer's Cross-Petition in Unfair Labour Practice Case — Employee Denied SSRP Scheme but Granted Reinstatement Without Back Wages or Lumpsum Compensation. Reinstatement with continuity of service upheld but lumpsum compensation option set aside as not a valid alternative under Section 30 of MRTU and PULP Act, 1971.

8 Aug 2013

The judgment involves two cross writ petitions arising from an order of the 7th Labour Court, Mumbai in Complaint (ULP) No.236 of 1994. The employee, ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Retired Railway Employee's Petition for Transfer of Quarters to Son. Transfer of Railway Quarters from Retiring Employee to Son is Not a Matter of Right but Subject to Administrative Policy and Availability.

17 Feb 2006

The petitioner, A.M. Attar, was a guard in the Central Railway who retired on 28 February 1997. He was allotted railway quarters at Byculla, Mumbai. H...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Industrial Tribunal's Order for Payment of Subsistence Allowance to Suspended Railway Employee. Employer's Failure to Pay Subsistence Allowance During Suspension Period Renders Subsequent Disciplinary Proceedings Invalid.

28 Jan 2005

The Union of India, through the Chief Workshop Manager of Central Railway, Parel, Mumbai, filed two writ petitions challenging orders of the Central G...

1 2 3 4

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)