Search Results for "Railway Crossing"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "Railway Crossing"

187 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 187 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Compensation to Family of Deceased Passenger in Railway Accident Case. Death of a bonafide passenger due to being knocked down by a train while crossing tracks between stations constitutes an 'untoward incident' under Section 123(c) of the Railways Act, 1989, and the absence of a ticket on the body does not negate bonafide passenger status.

6 May 2026

The case involves an appeal filed by the original applicants (the family of the deceased) against the order of the Railway Claims Tribunal, Mumbai, wh...

High Court

High Court Allows Compensation Claim in Railway Accident Case, Setting Aside Tribunal's Rejection Based on Insufficient Evidence. Court Held Co-Passenger Testimony Established Deceased as Bonafide Passenger and Death as Untoward Incident Under Railways Act, 1989, Despite Absence of Ticket and Official Reports from Non-Eyewitnesses.

16 Mar 2026

The appeal arose from a judgment dated 22nd March 2019 by the Railway Claims Tribunal, Mumbai, which rejected an application for compensation concerni...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Compensation to Deceased Passenger's Family in Railway Accident Case — Deceased Was a Bonafide Passenger While Alighting and Walking on Track Due to Lack of Foot Overbridge. The Court held that the deceased remained a bonafide passenger and the incident was an untoward incident under Section 123(c)(2) of the Railways Act, 1989, entitling the claimants to compensation under Section 124-A.

10 Oct 2022

The appellants, being the widow, son, and mother of the deceased Manohar Gajbhiye, filed a claim under the Railways Act, 1989 before the Railway Claim...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Railway Accident Claim — Deemed Untoward Incident Despite Falling on Opposite Track. Court Holds That a Passenger Falling from a Train Due to Rush and Being Hit by Another Train Constitutes an 'Untoward Incident' Under Section 123(c) of the Railways Act, 1989.

15 Apr 2026

The appeal arises from the dismissal of a compensation claim by the Railway Claims Tribunal, Mumbai, on the ground that the incident did not fall with...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Railway Accident Claim Case — Deemed Death as Untoward Incident Despite Crossing Tracks. Held that a bonafide passenger who falls from a train and dies on tracks is covered under Section 124-A of the Railways Act, 1989, even if later found on tracks.

5 Sep 2022

The appeal arises from a judgment of the Railway Claims Tribunal dismissing a claim for compensation under Section 124-A of the Railways Act, 1989. Th...

High Court

High Court Allows Compensation to Dependents of Railway Employee in Railway Accident Case, Reversing Tribunal's Denial Based on Contradictory Evidence. Accidental Fall from Moving Train Constitutes Untoward Incident Under Section 123(c)(2) of Railways Act, 1989, and Railway Employee with Free Pass Qualifies as Bonafide Passenger Regardless of Pass Recovery at Site.

9 Mar 2026

The appeal concerned a compensation claim under the Railways Act, 1989 filed by dependents of a railway employee who died after falling from a train. ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Railway's Appeal in Accidental Fall Case — Deemed Untoward Incident Under Railways Act. Ticket Found on Deceased Conclusive Proof of Bona Fide Passenger Status and Accidental Fall from Train.

31 Mar 2012

The case involves an appeal filed by the Union of India, represented by the General Manager (Claims) of South Central Railway, against the judgment an...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Railway Appeal in Motor Vehicle Accident Case — Negligence of Locomotive Driver Upheld. Compensation of Rs.3,70,600/- awarded to widow of deceased auto-rickshaw passenger killed at unmanned level crossing due to failure of railway to provide adequate safety measures.

21 Apr 2016

The case arises from a motor vehicle accident claim where the claimant, Smt. Shankaramma, sought compensation for the death of her husband, Rajani, ag...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Railway Compensation Case — Deemed Untoward Incident Under Section 16 of Railway Claims Tribunal Act, 1987. Death of a bona fide passenger falling from a train is an untoward incident, and the Railway Claims Tribunal erred in dismissing the claim based on lack of ticket recovery.

5 Feb 2024

The case involves an appeal filed by the legal heirs of Shrikrushna Dode, who died after falling from a moving train. The appellants claimed that on 1...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Railway Accident Claim — Deemed Untoward Incident Despite Deceased's Negligence. Death of a bona fide passenger who fell while boarding a moving train is an 'untoward incident' under Section 123(c) of the Railways Act, 1989, and negligence is not a defence under Section 124A.

30 Jan 2024

The appellants, being the wife and children of the deceased Gautam Patil, filed a claim for compensation before the Railway Claims Tribunal, Nagpur, a...

1 2 3 4

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)