Search Results for "Railway Accident Compensation Rules 1990"

43 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 43 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Railway Accident Case — Claimant Entitled to Compensation for Loss of Both Legs. Untoward Incident Under Section 124A of Railways Act, 1989 — Standing Near Door in Crowded Compartment Not Negligence.

The appellant, Ravichand Khurchankar, a 26-year-old student, was travelling by Howrah-Ahmedabad Express from Gondia to Nagpur on 7 July 2002. Due to o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Railway Accident Claim — Deemed Bonafide Passenger Based on Ticket Recovery and Witness Testimony. Accidental Fall from Train Constitutes Untoward Incident Under Section 124A of Railways Act, 1989.

The appeal was filed by the dependents of Anil Girdhar Thalkia against the dismissal of their claim for compensation by the Railway Claims Tribunal. T...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Railway Accident Case — Death Due to Accidental Fall from Train Constitutes Untoward Incident Under Railways Act, 1989. Widow and Children Entitled to Compensation as Deceased Was a Bona Fide Passenger and Fall Was Accidental, Not Self-Inflicted.

The case involves an appeal by the widow, children, and mother of Sanjay Awachare (deceased) against the dismissal of their claim petition by the Rail...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Nagpur Allows Appeal in Railway Accident Claim — Injured Passenger Entitled to Compensation for Amputation. Bona Fide Passenger Status Established Despite Lost Ticket; Sudden Jerk Leading to Fall Constitutes Untoward Incident Under Section 123(c) of Railways Act, 1989.

The appellant, Kishor Vishnu Bondre, filed a claim before the Railway Claims Tribunal, Nagpur, seeking compensation for injuries sustained in a train ...