Search Results for "RDDBFI Act"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Compulsory Retirement Case Based on Declining ...
Supreme Court Upholds High Court's Determination that Non-Signatory to MoS Not B...

Search Results for "RDDBFI Act"

22 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 22 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Bank's Appeal, Holds Borrower of Project Loan Not a Consumer Under Consumer Protection Act, 1986. Loan availed for commercial purpose of film post-production excludes company from consumer definition under Section 2(1)(d)(ii).

28 Feb 2025

The Supreme Court considered two appeals arising from an order of the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC) dated 30.08.2023. The ap...

High Court

High Court Allows Refund of Court Fees in DRT Proceedings When Main Petition Becomes Infructuous — Court Fees Act, 1870 Section 13. The Debt Recovery Tribunal has inherent power to order refund of court fees under Section 13 of the Court Fees Act, 1870 when the main petition is disposed of as infructuous.

19 Nov 2024

The petitioners, Sri Narayana Murthy H M and Smt. Chandrakala R., filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challe...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Refund of Court Fees in DRT Proceedings When Main Petition Becomes Infructuous — Section 16 of the Court Fees Act, 1870 Applicable. The court held that the DRT erred in rejecting the refund application without considering Section 16 of the Court Fees Act, 1870, which provides for refund when a case becomes infructuous.

19 Nov 2024

The petitioners, Sri Narayana Murthy H M and Smt. Chandrakala R., filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India before...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Secured Creditor's Appeal in Customs Duty Priority Dispute Over Wound-Up Company's Hypothecated Goods. Held that customs authorities do not have priority over secured creditors under Section 529A of Companies Act, 1956 for sale of warehoused goods under Customs Act, 1962.

1 Sep 2023

The appeal by Industrial Development Bank of India (IDBI) challenged the judgment of the Andhra Pradesh High Court which held that customs authorities...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Section 7 IBC Application by State Bank of India Against Krishidhan Seeds Private Limited — Limitation Extended by Acknowledgment in Balance Sheet Under Section 18 of Limitation Act, 1963. The Court set aside NCLT and NCLAT orders that had rejected the application as time-barred, holding that acknowledgments of debt, including in balance sheets, can extend limitation under Section 18 of the Limitation Act, 1963.

18 Apr 2022

The Supreme Court allowed an appeal by the State Bank of India (SBI) against the rejection of its application under Section 7 of the Insolvency and Ba...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal Against Rejection of Cross-Examination Application in DRT Proceedings — Failure to File Evidence Affidavit Justifies Denial of Cross-Examination Under Rule 12(6) of RDDBFI (Procedure) Rules, 1993.

26 Nov 2014

The appellants, M/s Perfect Polybaags Private Ltd. and its directors, were defendants in Original Application No.239/2011 pending before the Debt Reco...

High Court

Bombay High Court Permits Official Liquidator to File Criminal Complaint Under Section 454 of Companies Act, 1956 Against Ex-Directors for Non-Filing of Statement of Affairs. Court Directs Ex-Directors to Deposit Rs. 11,30,743/- as Estimated Cost of Investigation.

1 Aug 2014

The Bombay High Court considered an Official Liquidator's Report (OLR No. 5 of 2013) in the winding up of Phoenix Alchemy Pvt. Ltd. The company was or...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petitions Challenging DRT Orders in Debt Recovery Proceedings — Maintainability of Writ Petitions Under Article 227 Against Interlocutory Orders of DRT Discussed. The court held that writ petitions under Article 227 are not maintainable against interlocutory orders of DRT when an alternative remedy of appeal under Section 20 of the Recovery of Debts Due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act, 1993 is available.

4 Feb 2014

The case involves a batch of writ petitions filed by United Breweries (Holdings) Limited and others against various banks including State Bank of Indi...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows State Bank of India's Appeal Against MPID Act Attachment Order — Bank's Claim Over Property Prevails as Mortgage Was Prior to Default. Secured Creditor's Priority Under Section 31B of RDDBFI Act and Section 26E of SARFAESI Act Overrides MPID Act Attachment.

30 Nov -0001

The case involves an appeal by State Bank of India (SBI) against an order of the Special Court under the Maharashtra Protection of Interest of Deposit...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging DRT Order Allowing Recall of Witness for Cross-Examination. Debt Recovery Tribunal Has Inherent Power to Recall Witness Under Section 22 of Recovery of Debts Due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act, 1993 for Effective Adjudication.

30 Nov -0001

The petitioners, Deepak Kochhar and Rajeev Kochhar, filed a Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court ...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)