KAHC010159832015_1
15 Dec 2017...
Search Results for "Protocol Agreement"
110 result(s) found
Found 110 result(s)
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Reviews Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Award Under Section 48 of Arbitration Act. Challenges to Award Based on Public Policy and Lack of Notice Were Dismissed by Executing Court.
15 Dec 2025The respondent, a Korean company, chartered a vessel to the petitioner, an Indian firm, under a Charter Party dated 12.05.2004. Disputes arose over fr...
- 14
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Considers Scope of Section 45 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act in International Commercial Disputes. Multiple Issues Framed on Reference to Arbitration in Multi-Party Joint Venture Agreements.
1 Aug 2026The dispute arose from a series of joint venture and ancillary agreements executed between Indian company Chloro Controls (I) P. Ltd. and foreign coll...
- 70
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Builder's Suit for Specific Performance of Redevelopment Contract Against Cooperative Society. Expression of Interest Held Not a Binding Contract, No Obligation to Accept Highest Bid.
10 Jun 2013The plaintiff, Gopi Gorwani, a builder and developer, filed a suit against Ideal Cooperative Housing Society Limited and others seeking a declaration ...
- 143
High Court
High Court of Bombay Considers Motion to Set Aside Arrest of Vessel in Admiralty Suit: Arrest of M.V. Rainbow Ace Challenged on Ground of Non-Establishment of Common Beneficial Ownership Between Vessel Owner and Defaulting Charterer. Defendant Vessel Owner Asserts No Common Beneficial Ownership with Charterer, Seeking to Vacate Ex-Parte Arrest Order in Maritime Claim for Damages Under Voyage Charterparty.
6 May 2013In the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Admiralty and Vice Admiralty jurisdiction, the applicant, owner of the vessel M.V. Rainbow Ace, filed a not...
- 17
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Arbitration Appointment Application for Lack of Jurisdiction — Venue Designation in Lease Agreement Does Not Confer Seat of Arbitration. Court holds that mere mention of 'venue' in arbitration clause without specifying 'seat' does not vest jurisdiction in courts at the venue, especially when subject matter lies outside its territorial limits.
21 Mar 2023The applicant, Honey Bee Multitrading Pvt. Ltd., a company engaged in mustard oil manufacturing with its plant in Ganganagar, Rajasthan, entered into ...
- 54
High Court
High Court of Bombay Dismisses ONGC's Challenge to Arbitral Award in Vessel Maintenance Contract Dispute — No Interference Under Section 34 of Arbitration Act as Award Not Found to be in Conflict with Public Policy or Patent Illegality. The court upheld the arbitral tribunal's interpretation that the respondent was not liable for pre-existing HOTO defects, as the contract did not impose such liability.
18 Oct 2010The petitioner, Oil & Natural Gas Corpn. Ltd. (ONGC), challenged an arbitral award dated 2nd April, 2008 under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conci...
- 50
High Court
High Court Issues Directions in Slum Rehabilitation Writ Petitions; Expresses Grave Concern Over Alleged Fraud. No Final Verdict; Ongoing Investigation into Trafficking of Tenements and Non-Fixation of Transit Rent Under SRA Circular.
20 Jun 2023The Bombay High Court issued a detailed common order in a batch of writ petitions filed by slum dwellers of the Kolekalyan Slum Rehabilitation Authori...
- 32
Supreme Court
Supreme Court of India: Judgment on Regulation and Approval of Genetically Modified Crops. Ensuring adherence to environmental safety, legal standards, and public health in the approval process for GM crops in India.
23 Jul 2024The Supreme Court of India concerning various writ petitions filed in public interest related to the regulation and approval of Genetically Modified (...
- 695
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Under Section 37 of Arbitration Act in Demurrage Dispute, Upholding Concurrent Findings Below. Clause 10(v) Held to Create Direct Liability for Demurrage, Not Indemnity, and Counterclaim for Option Cargo Damages Rejected.
21 Dec 2016The dispute arose from a coal supply contract dated 18 September 1999 between the appellant, an Indian company, and the respondent, an Australian comp...
- 26
