Search Results for "Pension Regulations Army 1961"

29 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 29 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Ex-Servicemen's Claims for Full Disability Pension Arrears -- Union of India's Appeal Dismissed -- Judgment in Rem Overrides Limitation Periods for Recurring Pension Rights Under Armed Forces Tribunal Act

The Supreme Court addressed multiple civil appeals concerning arrears of disability pension for ex-servicemen -- The central issue was whether arrears...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Examines Union's Writ Against AFT Order Allowing Disability Pension. Dispute Centers on Whether AFT Correctly Applied Dharamvir Singh Precedent to Overrule Ministry's Finding of Non-Attributability.

The Union of India filed this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to quash the order of the Armed Forces Tribunal (AFT), Chen...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Madras Considers Writ of Certiorari Against Armed Forces Tribunal's Order Granting Disability Pension Under Pension Regulations. Union of India Argues That Post-2008 Regulations Remove Presumptions, and Dharamvir Singh Decision Based on Old Rules Is Inapplicable.

The Union of India, through the Ministry of Defence, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Jud...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Quashes Armed Forces Tribunal Order Granting Disability Pension to Ex-Serviceman for Primary Hypertension. Disability Not Attributable to Military Service as Onset Occurred in Peace Station, Contrary to Para 179 of Pension Regulations for the Army, 1961.

This writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution challenged the Armed Forces Tribunal's order granting disability pension to a discharged Havi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal by Union of India in Army Dismissal Case Due to Procedural Irregularity. Summary Court Martial Conducted Without Following Mandatory Procedure Under Army Rules 22-24 and Section 80 of Army Act, 1950 Renders Dismissal Void.

The Union of India, Ministry of Defence, and other appellants challenged an order dated 5th September 2001 passed by a learned Single Judge of the Kar...