Search Results for "Payment of Gratuity Act"

25 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 25 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Upholds Rejection of Gratuity Claims by Ex-Promoters of Innovative Technomics Pvt. Ltd. Former directors' claims for gratuity dismissed on grounds of not fitting the legal definition of 'employee' under the Payment of Gratuity Act.

The Bombay High Court dismissed the petitions filed by ex-promoters and directors Anil Govind Ganu and Ashwini Anil Ganu, challenging the denial of gr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Rules on Jurisdiction in Gratuity Payment Dispute. Bombay High Court Clarifies the Applicability of the Payment of Gratuity Act for Managing Directors.

The Bombay High Court recently delivered a judgment in a case involving Vitesco Technologies India Pvt. Ltd. and its former Managing Director, Christo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Court Quashes Post-Retirement Inquiry, Orders Release of Retiral Benefits. Retired Employee Wins Pension and Gratuity Dispute; Court Rules Against Late Departmental Inquiry, Mandates Timely Payment with Interest

The court heard the petitioner's plea to release his pension and gratuity, quash a post-retirement departmental inquiry, and annul related orders. The...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Employees' Right to Gratuity in Pending Criminal Appeals Under Kerala Service Rules. Interpretation of Rules 3 and 3A of Kerala Service Rules Distinguishes Pension from Death-cum-Retirement Gratuity, Prohibiting Withholding Despite Conviction with Suspended Sentence.

The Supreme Court examined appeals arising from a Full Bench judgment of the Kerala High Court concerning the entitlement of government employees to D...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Employer's Acceptance of Voluntary Retirement Under Modified Voluntary Retirement Scheme (MVRS). Resignation Submitted Under MVRS Was Unconditional and Could Not Be Withdrawn After Acceptance, as Per Scheme Terms Under Clause 5.1.

The dispute arose from the respondent's resignation under the Modified Voluntary Retirement Scheme (MVRS) introduced by the appellants, a public secto...