Search Results for "Parle International"

77 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 77 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Interim Injunction in Trademark Infringement Suit Over 'MAUJ' vs 'MOJ' — No Deceptive Similarity Found. Phonetic and structural comparison of marks 'MAUJ' and 'MOJ' held not deceptively similar; plaintiff failed to establish prima facie case for interim relief.

The plaintiff, Mauj Mobile Private Limited, filed a commercial IP suit alleging infringement of its registered trademark 'MAUJ' (registered in Classes...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Show Cause Notices in Service Tax Case Due to Limitation and Lack of Jurisdiction. Multiple SCNs issued beyond normal period of limitation without proper justification under proviso to Section 73(1) of Finance Act, 1994 are invalid.

The petitioner, ATA Freight Line (I) Pvt. Ltd., a company engaged in freight forwarding and logistics services, filed a writ petition under Article 22...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Show Cause Notice After 16-Year Delay Due to Inordinate and Unexplained Lapse of Time. Revenue Cannot Keep Show Cause Notice Pending Indefinitely Without Any Adjudication or Communication to Assessee.

The Bombay High Court, in a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, quashed a show cause notice issued by the Deputy Commissione...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Review Petition in International Commercial Arbitration Case. Substitution of Arbitrator by Consent Cures Jurisdictional Defect Under Section 11(9) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The review petitioner, Soham Shah, sought recall of an order dated 27 June 2014 passed by the designate of the Chief Justice of the Bombay High Court ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition to Set Aside Termination of Arbitral Proceedings and Constitute New Arbitral Tribunal Under Sections 9 and 14 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — Delay Condoned Due to Sufficient Cause Shown by Legal Heirs of Deceased Partner.

The petitioners, Neeta Lalit Sanghavi and Hemanshu Lalit Sanghavi, are the legal heirs of the deceased partner, Lalitkumar Vanmalidas Sanghavi. They f...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Eviction Order Under Public Premises Act — Land Already Acquired Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894. Petitioners' Claim of Possession Since 1954 Fails as Land Vested in Airport Authority After Acquisition in 1947-48.

The petitioners, heirs of Mohan Bhika Rathod, filed a writ petition challenging an eviction order passed by the Estate Officer under the Public Premis...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Complainant's Challenge Against Discharge of Accused in Import Export Act Case. Complaints under Section 5 of Import and Export (Control) Act, 1947 were not maintainable as the Act stood repealed and complaints lacked valid sanction.

The Deputy Chief Controller of Import & Export, Mumbai, filed separate complaints against various accused before the Metropolitan Magistrate, 19th Cou...