Search Results for "Original Side Rule 986"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "Original Side Rule 986"

35 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 35 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Employer's Appeal and Sets Aside Tribunal's Award in Retrenchment Case – Managerial Decision to Reorganise Business and Retrench Employees Held Bona Fide; Tribunal Cannot Question Propriety. Retrenchment in Compliance with Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Section 25F and West Bengal Industrial Disputes Rules, 1958 Rule 77(1); Error of Tribunal in Ignoring Bona Fide Nature of Decision Corrected via Certiorari.

27 Nov 1968

The dispute arose from the retrenchment of employees by Parry & Co. Ltd. following a policy decision to reorganise its business by emphasising manufac...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Determines Fair Compensation in Appeal Against Enhanced Award Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894. Cross-Objections Seeking Higher Rate Considered Alongside State's Challenge to Reference Court's Award of Rs.1,500 per sq.m.

17 Apr 2026

The State of Maharashtra acquired land in Village Padghe, Taluka Panvel, District Raigad, for the New Bombay Project under the Land Acquisition Act, 1...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Probate Petition for Will Executed by NRI in Ecuador. Will executed abroad by Non-Resident Indian held valid under Section 63 of Indian Succession Act, 1925, and probate granted to executor in Mumbai.

16 Oct 2025

The petitioner, Sarwan Kumar Jhabarmal Choudhary, filed a testamentary petition (L) No. 6300 of 2024 in the Bombay High Court seeking probate of the L...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeals in Property Declaration Suits — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With. Appellants failed to prove title and possession; no substantial question of law arose under Section 100 CPC.

20 Dec 2019

The judgment pertains to two Regular First Appeals (R.F.A.No.784/2013 and R.F.A.No.785/2013) filed under Section 96 read with Order 41 Rule 1 of the C...

High Court

Bombay High Court Declares LIC Owner of Suit Property, Orders Removal of Unauthorized Construction by Defendants. Defendants' claim based on revenue stay order and adverse possession fails as LIC's title from 1948 conveyance and statutory vesting under Life Insurance Corporation Act, 1956 is established.

5 Dec 2018

The Life Insurance Corporation of India (LIC) filed a suit seeking declaration of ownership, removal of construction, and possession of land in Eksar,...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Cross Objection Despite Dismissal of Main Appeal for Non-Removal of Office Objections. Cross Objection under Section 253(4) of Income Tax Act, 1961 is an independent proceeding and does not abate with dismissal of appeal.

9 Aug 2016

The case involves a Cross Objection filed by Cipla Limited (the assessee) under Section 253(4) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, in response to an Income T...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Disqualification of Bid in Tender Process for Distribution Franchisee — Violation of Natural Justice and Arbitrary Action by State Entity. The court quashed the disqualification of the petitioner's bid due to non-submission of power of attorney in prescribed format, holding that the respondent failed to provide prior notice or opportunity to explain.

28 Jul 2010

The petitioner, A2Z Maintenance & Engineering Services Limited, filed a writ petition challenging the disqualification of its bid by the Maharashtra S...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Land Acquisition Corrigendum for Non-Existent Road — Adding New Purpose Without Fresh Notification Invalid Under Section 4(1) of Land Acquisition Act, 1894. Land Acquisition Officer's Report Under Section 5A Recommending Dropping Acquisition Binding on Government.

22 Apr 2014

The petitioners, Silvestre D' Souza and his wife Apolita D' Souza, purchased parts of a property in Santa Cruz, Goa, including a dwelling house. They ...

High Court

High Court Allows Appeal in Land Dispute, Grants Interim Injunction Against Creating Third-Party Rights. Appellants Challenge Trial Court's Rejection of Injunction in Property Recovery Suit

17 Feb 2026

The Appellants, filed an Appeal from Order under Section 104 read with Order 43 Rule 1(r) of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC), challenging the ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds FIRs for Illegal Mining Despite Compounding Under MMDR Act — IPC Offences Are Distinct and Not Barred by Section 22 of MMDR Act. The court held that compounding under the MMDR Act does not bar prosecution under the IPC for theft and criminal misappropriation, as the offences are separate and distinct.

1 Sep 2020

The Supreme Court dismissed appeals by private appellants and the State of Madhya Pradesh against the High Court's refusal to quash FIRs for illegal m...

1 2 3 4

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)