Search Results for "Order XXXIX CPC"

108 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 108 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Wife's Appeal Against Dismissal of Petition and Striking Out of Defence Under Order XXXIX Rule 11 CPC. Non-Compliance with Access Orders Disputed; Video Evidence and Counsellor Report Considered.

The appellant wife filed Family Court Appeal No.20 of 2013 challenging the order dated 8th November 2012 passed by the Family Court at Mumbai. By that...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Appoints Court Receiver in Property Dispute Between Family Members Over Sonal Building and Flat No.3A. Court Receiver appointed under Order XL CPC for building and flat, with power to appoint agent for use on payment of compensation.

The present Notice of Motion was taken out by the plaintiff, Rohit Vanmalidas Mehta, in a suit pending before the Bombay High Court. The dispute perta...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Revision Petition, Restores Suit Dismissed as Withdrawn Without Consent of All Plaintiffs in Representative Suit Under Order I Rule 8 CPC. Suit filed under Order I Rule 8 CPC cannot be withdrawn by some plaintiffs without consent of all and without court permission.

The petitioners, original plaintiffs No.5, 7, and 9, filed a civil revision petition under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) chal...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Full Bench Rules on Scope of Trial Court's Authority Under Section 9-A CPC. Trial Courts Cannot Partially Dispose of Suits in Preliminary Issues on Jurisdiction.

The Full Bench addressed whether a Trial Court, under Section 9-A of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC), can frame an issue that disposes of a su...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court of India Held Appellants Guilty of Contempt for Disobedience of Undertaking Regarding Alienation of Suit Property

Disobedience of an injunction order remains punishable even if the underlying suit is later dismissed (Samee Khan v. Bindu Khan). A lawyer’...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Partition Appeal for Lack of Evidence of Joint Family Property. Court holds that plaintiffs failed to prove that suit properties were ancestral joint family properties, and the suit was barred by limitation and res judicata.

The appeal arises from a judgment and decree dated 30.01.2018 passed by the Senior Civil Judge, Kolar, in O.S. No. 42/2012, dismissing the suit for pa...